Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams --skill python-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams/python-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams/python-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams/python-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams/python-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams/python-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00200 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00080 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
python-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/python-review
This skill is muggle-ai-teams' /python-review command, for Codex. The command itself is ../../../commands/python-review.md, three directories above this file. Read it and follow it as your instructions:
- Its
$ARGUMENTSis what the user wrote after$muggle-ai-teams:python-review, and$1,$2, … are the words of that text; with nothing written, they are empty. - It was written for Claude Code. Where it names a Claude Code tool, slash command or path, use the Codex equivalent from
../../host-tool-equivalents.md.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 14 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 2cfeb68a75b3
python-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository multiplex-ai/muggle-ai-teams (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 200 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
Unit Test Scaffold (Python/pytest)
Generate Python/pytest unit test skeletons from specifications.
coding_qa.review
Review Python files for bugs, suggest fixes, and provide test cases.
verify-language
Language-specific verification for Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, and Go. Checks type safety, language idioms, and best practices. Use when asked to "verify language", "check types", or for language-specific checks.
python-refactoring
Analyze Python code for refactoring opportunities, complexity, dead code, security issues, modernization, test coverage gaps, and package-level structure — before proposing or making refactoring changes to Python code.
python-anti-patterns
Common Python anti-patterns and a pre-merge review checklist.
TypeScript Strictness Guard
Enforce TypeScript strictness by reducing any/unsafe assertions and ensuring null handling.