Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit --skill keel-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00747 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00299 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
keel-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
"phase 0 — nothing to audit yet" and stop. Otherwise the range is `$(cat .claude/last-audit)..HEAD` Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
What it actually says
/keel-audit — check the recent work against rules.md
When: the SessionStart hook nudges (default: >25 commits since the last audit), at /keel-phase-review, or
on demand. Complements — never replaces — /keel-distill (memory lint) and verifier (single claims): this
is the "is the project still following its own constitution?" sweep. Post-compact drift gets a free
30-second inline self-check from the re-ground hook; this skill is the deep pass.
- Follow-up FIRST — what became of the LAST audit's findings. Open the previous report
(
reports/<date>-audit.md, newest) and, before any new finding, write one line per earlier finding:id · decision (fixed / deferred / rejected) · landed? (sha or "not landed") · measurement then → now. Count the fourth outcome separately — silently dropped (evaluated, never tracked) — and re-measure every rejection's stated reason: is it still true today? A landed fix whose number did not move is itself a finding. First audit: write "first round, no follow-up" — the section is never skipped. Field: an audit's 30 recommendations were all evaluated and none tracked until this table existed; a finding-producing audit that never measures change is noise. - Scope. Phase-0 guard: if the source tree is still empty and the docs are placeholders, report
"phase 0 — nothing to audit yet" and stop. Otherwise the range is
$(cat .claude/last-audit)..HEADwhen the marker exists (else the last ~25 commits). - Run. Spawn the
auditorsubagent (.claude/agents/auditor.md) with the range — don't audit inline; the point is fresh eyes in an isolated context. Spot-check its claims before acting (§4.11: verify, don't trust). - Report & fix. Present the severity-ranked table. Apply ONLY user-approved fixes; real-but-deferred
findings get one line each in
TASKS.md ## Discovered. Never fix silently (§10.36). - Record. Write the findings table + the follow-up table + the auditor's own hit rate
(
refuted claims / total claims, from your spot-check in step 2 — a critic whose accuracy is never measured becomes a voice nobody can challenge) toreports/<date>-audit.md— that file is what the NEXT audit's step 0 reads. Write the audited HEAD sha to.claude/last-audit(resets the hook's due-counter); add the HANDOVER block (a) one-lineraudit @ <sha>: N findings, M fixed, hit rate K/N; commit with approval (rules.md §1.3). - Not this skill's job: critiquing whether a RULE is right or the process is healthy. That is the
owner-triggered
observeragent (.claude/agents/observer.md) — compliance here, critique there; neither output stands in for the other's.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +14 lines 40de73c8f120
- 2mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A c56a4caeba32
keel-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 747 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
requesting-code-review
Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
architecture-review
Review a diff or a branch range for the architecture drift lint cannot see. Run the scoped linters and the parity check first. Then work a checklist keyed to dev/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: new Api operations or contract shapes without a ruling, new or cut edges between modules, authorization or audit hand-rolled beside the…
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
prs-awaiting-maintainer
List open pull requests where the ball is in the maintainer's court: CI is green and the PR is ready for a maintainer to review, re-review, or merge. Use when the user wants to see PRs awaiting maintainer action.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…