Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit --skill keel-autopilotgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-autopilot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-autopilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-autopilot.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.01059 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00530 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
keel-autopilot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/keel-autopilot — phases advance themselves; evidence gates don't move
When: the user explicitly turns it on ("/keel-autopilot", "autopilot", "work through the phases on your own"). Autonomy is the USER's grant, never self-granted — and it changes WHO presses the button, not WHAT the gates require.
Who may run it: a SOLO session, or an agent team's ORCHESTRATOR — never a worker/co-agent. This
mode runs /keel-phase-review (rule 2) and commits (rule 3), and §10.42 forbids a worker BOTH. So
check identity before the first step: the reground hook prints this session's agent from
.claude/agent-team-sessions; if it names a worker charter, say so and stop. Do NOT infer the answer
from git config user.name — same-machine agent sessions all share ONE git identity, which is exactly
why rule 4's ownership check cannot see this by itself.
Mode contract (4 rules):
- In-phase autonomy. Work the wip phase's
TASKS ## Nowitems back-to-back without pausing for confirmation; make routine judgment calls yourself (§10.36). Memory discipline stays hot-path: LESSONS the moment something is learned, TASKS updated as you go — autopilot without the rituals is just drift at higher speed. On a multi-user project, an@-assigned item still STARTS with the §10.41 spec briefing before the work (task-specific, self-explanatory questions; check the spec's Comprehension log first — an already-answered question is never re-asked). - Gates stay evidence-based. When
## Nowempties, run the FULL/keel-phase-reviewchecklist yourself. PASS needs real evidence (tests green viamake test, the gate's done-when observed) — never narrate a pass. PASS → flip the phase, seed the next## Nowfrom PLAN.md, continue. FAIL → stop and report what's missing. - Commit locally, batch the push. Commit at each phase end (owner identity, §6.16); do NOT push.
Accumulate the queue and present it at session end (or on request) for ONE approval.
settings.json'saskon push is the enforced backstop — never weaken it for this mode. - Stop-and-ask triggers. Halt and return to the user when: a gate FAILS · a decision is
UNCERTAIN (verifier verdict or §10.37 grounding gap) · a scope/architecture surprise would need a
new ADR · anything security-adjacent (secrets, auth, non-routine dependency changes) · a bulk
output hits the
/keel-pilotthreshold (its human-routing rules override autopilot) · the same test is red twice after fixes · the next## Nowitem or wip phase belongs to someone else — autopilot NEVER does another's assigned work; stop and surface it (the parallel-work collision the ownership tag exists to prevent). Match ownership on the RIGHT key: on a human multi-user project that is@owner≠git config user.name; on a same-machine agent team every session shares one git identity, so compare the item's lane/@tagagainst this session's agent name from.claude/agent-team-sessionsinstead — the git check alone is inert there and silently passes.
Boundaries:
- One session. Cross-session automation (cron, /loop) is out of scope — re-request the mode each
session, or make it a standing project agreement via a
LESSONS.md [rule]line. - After any compaction, re-confirm. The activation may live only in summarized-away conversation; ask one line ("autopilot still on?") before continuing autonomously. Note the activation in the next HANDOVER block (d) so the grant survives on disk.
- Never bypassed: push approval,
/keel-pilothuman routing, hook blocks, §0 bootstrap approvals,/keel-distill's never-lossy-delete. The Stop hooks (plan-phase-nudge, handover reminder) keep firing — they are the net under the tightrope, not an annoyance to suppress.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 53 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A b4bb1bafd7ba
keel-autopilot is a skill published in the GitHub repository muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,059 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
contextual-commit
Write contextual commits that capture intent, decisions, and constraints alongside code changes. Use when committing code, finishing a task, or when the user asks to commit. Extends Conventional Commits with structured action lines in the commit body that preserve WHY code was written, not just WHAT changed.
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
cross-repo-cache
Check if cross-repo coordinator results can be reused, avoiding redundant Sonnet agent launches. Compares peer repo git hashes against stored hashes from last coordinator run. Triggers on: entering Phase 1.4.1, checking cross-repo cache, before discovering peers. Returns CROSSREPOCACHEHIT with cached status or…
open-pr-fix
Act on the findings a review left on a PR or MR: take or decline each by severity, edit the code, one commit, reply. Use when handed a PR or MR URL that has already been reviewed. Edits real code.
gmc
Use the gmc CLI for explicit gmc requests: generate commit messages, create or remove worktrees, prune merged worktrees, discover or sync shared resources, or run other gmc wt subcommands. Triggers mainly when the user invokes /gmc or mentions gmc wt add, gmc wt prune, gmc wt share, gmc wt sync, gmc tag, or asks to…
commit
Conventional Commits 1.0 generator. Stages relevant files, infers type(scope): description, never uses --no-verify.