Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit --skill keel-phase-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-phase-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-phase-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-phase-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-phase-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit/keel-phase-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01078 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
keel-phase-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/keel-phase-review — end-of-phase checkpoint
Run at the end of a phase (rules.md §2). Report the checklist with pass/fail; fix gaps before proposing a commit.
Checklist:
- Working product — the phase's feature runs; include a one-line "how to test this" for the user. What only a human can verify (browser/UX, prod host, real creds) is handed off as a recipe and tracked in HANDOVER (d) — never silently assumed passed.
- Tests — relevant unit/integration (e2e if needed) written and run via
make test(auto-log →reports/tests/<date>/); the phase's committed summary written toreports/tests/<date>-phase<N>.md(suites, counts, what was verified, and measured durations: suite runtime + the gate's key step timings — WHAT to time is project-specific (E2E latency, first token, query ms, batch throughput, …) — side-by-side with the previous phase's numbers so slowdowns surface at the gate, not in production); new test/fixture files one-lined in their folder README; repeatedly-run corpora (golden / regression / pilot question sets) exist as DATA files with stable ids —tests/fixtures/or a corpus dir indexed fromtests/README.md, never only inline in test code (§10.39 feeds them: every point-fixed failing case joins one); one-line summary in HANDOVER.md (rules.md §2.8); bulk outputs passed the/keel-pilotgates where applicable. Ad-hoc reports (speed tests, golden proofs) complementreports/tests/<date>-phase<N>.md— never replace it. - Architecture — every structural change recorded in
docs/architecture.md: new/changed module rows AND the component overview resynced with them (the module table is the source of truth — a stale top diagram fails this item, same contract as PLAN.md's table → diagram; rules.md §1.6). - PLAN.md (do not skip — this is what marks the phase
done) — the finished phase's gate flipped todone(+ next phase setwip, Current focus updated, diagram regenerated from the table — see/keel-plan). The Stop hookplan-phase-nudgereminds you if you end a turn having cleared awipphase's## Nowwithout flipping it. - ADRs — any significant decision captured as an ADR in
docs/adr/(+ index row). - Docs — CLAUDE.md / docs/user_manual.md updated, or the review states why nothing user-facing
changed. A still-template
user_manual.mdwhile shipped phases have user-facing behavior = FAIL (the SessionStart hook warns on this too — silence is not a pass). - HANDOVER.md — session block added (run
/keel-handover); caps respected (else/keel-distill). - TASKS.md — done items deleted (one-liners in HANDOVER (a));
## Discoveredtriaged. - LESSONS.md — this phase's agreed rules/tests/gotchas written (rules §9.31).
- Audit —
/keel-auditrun over this phase's range via the skill — it writes.claude/last-audit; an inline audit that skips the marker leaves the audit-due nudge firing forever (or consciously skipped with a reason); its approved fixes applied (rules.md §4.11). - Code review —
/code-review(or the project's review flow) run over this phase's diff; each finding triaged through theverifiersubagent (adversarial "try to refute") before any fix is applied: CONFIRMED → fix now · REFUTED → record with its counter-evidence · UNCERTAIN → ask the user (default: don't fix). Reviewer output is a claim, not a verdict (rules.md §4.11); deferred items get one line each inTASKS.md ## Discovered. The phase gate is the review boundary — cheaper than reviewing every session, earlier than reviewing at release. - Secrets —
git diff --cachedreviewed; no.env/secrets staged (rules.md §6.18). - Deps — if dependencies changed: lock refreshed +
pip-auditclean (rules.md §7.23).
Then propose an approved commit + push (rules.md §6.15). Never push without user approval.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 53 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 21634f9b27d6
keel-phase-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,078 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-carnet
Use this skill when the user asks to save, recall, find, or organize notes. Triggers on: 'remember this', 'save this', 'note this', 'what did we discuss about...', 'check the notebook', 'find in carnet'. Also use proactively when discovering findings worth preserving across sessions.
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…
security-audit
Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.
taiyi-ui-design
A design-planning guide for describing how an application's user interface should look and behave. It produces a UI-DESIGN.md document covering layouts, components, interactions, accessibility, and error states.
taiyi-evolve
A workflow skill that compares the implemented code with the frozen design after development and testing. It records architecture changes and proposes updates to DESIGN.md, the document describing the intended system structure.
taiyi-diagram-c4
A code-scanning tool that builds C4 architecture documents from a repository. It separates facts observed in the code from conclusions inferred about the design and uses Mermaid diagrams as the source format.