Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add murphytrueman/design-system-ops --skill component-decision-treegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/murphytrueman/design-system-opsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/component-decision-tree)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/component-decision-tree"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/component-decision-tree/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/component-decision-tree"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/component-decision-tree.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.04160 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01664 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00832 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00416 |
Grade A, and why
component-decision-tree scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Component decision tree
A skill for building decision trees that map user intents and requirements to specific component selections. The primary output is a set of "Choosing between…" pages in the docs, one per cluster of confusable components, written as the questions a senior designer would ask; the same trees can be written as YAML for tooling when something will read it. Both reduce the guesswork that leads to component misuse, duplication, and inconsistency.
Before you begin: verify references
Confirm that every path in this skill's frontmatter references: exists relative to this SKILL.md. If any is missing, stop: the install is incomplete, usually because a flattening installer (for example npx skills install) dropped the repo-root knowledge-notes/ directory. Tell the user to reinstall by a method in 1-INSTALL.md and run verify-install.sh from the install root. Proceed without the references only if the user explicitly says to, and then say in the output that it was produced without the pack's reference material.
Context
Component selection is the first decision in any design system interaction, and it is the one that AI agents get wrong most often. The failure mode is not random — it follows predictable patterns. An agent selects a Modal when a Dialog was appropriate. It uses a Card where a List Item fits better. It creates a custom component because it could not find the existing one that serves the need.
These errors have the same root cause: the agent does not have a decision framework. It has a list of components (if it has anything at all) and it pattern-matches the user's request against component names and descriptions. This works when the match is obvious ("I need a button" → Button) and fails when the match requires judgment ("I need to show a collection of items that users can filter and sort" → is that a Table, a DataGrid, a List with filters, or a custom composition?).
Decision trees encode the judgment. Instead of relying on an agent's ability to infer the right component from a description, the tree asks a structured sequence of questions that narrow the selection to the correct component. The questions are the same ones a senior designer or developer would ask when advising a junior team member.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · -9 lines · +4 tokens per session 526aa80b17c2
- 27d ago Changed · -19 lines · -59 tokens per session 9b05fef3430b
- 1mo ago First seen · 365 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 100d62e89e57
component-decision-tree is a skill published in the GitHub repository murphytrueman/design-system-ops (208 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 4,160 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
extract-design
Extract the full design language from any website URL. Produces 8 output files including AI-optimized markdown, visual HTML preview, Tailwind config, React theme, shadcn/ui theme, Figma variables, W3C design tokens, and CSS variables. Also runs WCAG accessibility scoring. Use when user says 'extract design', 'get…
designlang-tokens
Use when styling UI for cal.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.
roast-my-design-system
Roast the current repo's design system with real data. Runs a deterministic scanner (no tokens, 1s) that counts everything that betrays a design system, from colours and their near-identical twins to greys, spacing values, typefaces, duplicated and never-imported components, inline styles, !important and arbitrary…
generate-figma-screen
Kod veya açıklamadan Figma'da tam ekran/sayfa oluşturur. Yayınlanmış design system bileşenlerini arayıp instance olarak yerleştirir; hardcode değer yerine DS token'larını kullanır. "Figma'da ekran oluştur", "kodu Figma'ya çevir", "landing page çiz", "ekran tasarla", "generate screen", "UI'ı Figma'ya aktar"…
fmcp-intent-router
F-MCP ile ilgili herhangi bir kullanıcı talebinin ilk giriş noktası. Kullanıcının niyetini analiz eder, hangi hedef SKILL'in çalıştırılacağına karar verir, o SKILL için gereken eksik input'ları tek turda toplar, özet+onay alır ve ondan sonra hedef SKILL'i çalıştırır. "figma", "ekran oluştur", "tasarım yap", "component…
fmcp-screen-recipes
Fast path cookbook — standart ekran tipleri (login/payment/profile/list/detail/form/onboarding/dashboard/settings) için 5 mega-adımlı recipe. Max 15 op/execute, cache-first discovery, her adımda Türkçe micro-report.