Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add murphytrueman/design-system-ops --skill schema-validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/murphytrueman/design-system-opsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/schema-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/schema-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/schema-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/schema-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/murphytrueman/design-system-ops/schema-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 37 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.03737 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01495 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00747 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
schema-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Schema validator
A skill for validating that design token files conform to their expected format — DTCG 2025.10 (token files and resolver documents), Style Dictionary 3, 4 or 5, Tokens Studio, or a custom schema. Catches structural issues before they break build pipelines, cause silent failures, or produce incorrect output.
Before you begin: verify references
Confirm that every path in this skill's frontmatter references: exists relative to this SKILL.md. If any is missing, stop: the install is incomplete, usually because a flattening installer (for example npx skills install) dropped the repo-root knowledge-notes/ directory. Tell the user to reinstall by a method in 1-INSTALL.md and run verify-install.sh from the install root. Proceed without the references only if the user explicitly says to, and then say in the output that it was produced without the pack's reference material.
Context
Token files are infrastructure. When a token file is malformed — a missing $type declaration, a $value that resolves to nothing, an alias that points to a deleted token — the failure mode is rarely loud. The build might still succeed. The wrong value might ship. The design intent might be silently lost.
Schema validation is the first line of defence. It answers a simple question: do these files meet the structural contract they claim to meet? A DTCG file must have $value on every token. A Style Dictionary file must have valid reference syntax. A Tokens Studio export must preserve group hierarchy.
This skill is not about naming conventions or architectural quality — those belong in token-audit. This skill is about structural integrity: can the file be parsed, transformed, and consumed by downstream tools without error?
Boundaries
This skill validates token file structure only. It does not assess naming quality (use naming-audit), token architecture health (use token-audit), or token usage in code (use token-compliance). If the token source format is not recognisable as DTCG, Style Dictionary, Tokens Studio, or a declared custom schema, ask the user to identify the format before proceeding. If no token files are provided or accessible, there is nothing to validate — stop and confirm the file location with the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed · +16 lines · +4 tokens per session 2f6253844fce
- 26d ago Changed · +14 lines · -6 tokens per session baeb4c5d9129
- 1mo ago First seen · 209 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 447a1432b588
schema-validator is a skill published in the GitHub repository murphytrueman/design-system-ops (208 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 3,737 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fmcp-ds-audit-orchestrator
Figma ekranlarını 5 kategori açısından platform-agnostic denetler (DS compliance / a11y / drift / visual QA / impact). Read-only çalışır; bulguları raporlar, düzeltmeleri sadece önerir — mutation için onay + ayrı agent. Her platformda çalışır. Condensed-first: Essentials bölümü %80 case'i kapsar, Advanced sadece edge…
design-fidelity-verify
Prove a running app matches its design spec by measuring rendered values, not eyeballing a screenshot. Use when the user says "verify the design", "is this pixel-perfect", "check against Figma", "does the app match the design", or "design QA this screen". Runs a bounded vision+numeric loop over web or mobile…
extract-design
Extract the full design language from any website URL. Produces 8 output files including AI-optimized markdown, visual HTML preview, Tailwind config, React theme, shadcn/ui theme, Figma variables, W3C design tokens, and CSS variables. Also runs WCAG accessibility scoring. Use when user says 'extract design', 'get…
designlang-tokens
Use when styling UI for cal.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.
build-swiftui-interface
Use when a coding agent must design, scaffold, implement, or verify an iOS or macOS SwiftUI interface with Apple-platform state, accessibility, availability, testing, and Xcode evidence.
roast-my-design-system
Roast the current repo's design system with real data. Runs a deterministic scanner (no tokens, 1s) that counts everything that betrays a design system, from colours and their near-identical twins to greys, spacing values, typefaces, duplicated and never-imported components, inline styles, !important and arbitrary…