Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mystilleef/spae-framework/spae-buildnpx skills add mystilleef/spae-framework --skill spae-buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mystilleef/spae-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mystilleef/spae-framework/spae-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mystilleef/spae-framework/spae-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mystilleef/spae-framework/spae-build.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.02186 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01093 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00437 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00219 |
Grade C, and why
spae-build scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Hidden instructionshighPrompt injection
Directives inside HTML comments, invisible characters or bidirectional overrides are read by the model and not by the person reviewing the file.
<!-- prettier-ignore-start --> How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build
When to use
STATE.jsonhasphase: build.- The work stream needs the next planned task completed.
Goal
- Execute exactly one task from
PLAN.md, mutating source/tests plusSTATE.json, while preserving the framework execution cursor. - Complete the active task with minimal production code that meets
exhaustive tests, serves its
Intentand the plan## Goal, and leaves seams for downstream tasks. - Meet the task acceptance criteria through exhaustive tests and task verification steps.
- Hand off to
/checkfor thedonetransition and cursor advance; never claim either.
Input
Read:
.spae/current/STATE.jsonfor phase, cursor, and task registry (consultreferences/STATE.mdfor field reference, directives, and phase snapshots)..spae/current/PLAN.mdfor the plan## Goal, the active task, itsIntent, acceptance criteria, and verification steps; they carry all the goal context build needs.- Relevant project source, tests, docs, and configuration needed for the active task.
Testing
See references/testing-guide.md for test structure, isolation,
mocking, assertion, and performance standards.
Cleanup
See references/cleanup-guide.md for the self-introduced-artifact
checklist and diff-only audit scope.
Workflow
- GATE—Confirm
.spae/current/STATE.jsonhasphase: buildand an active task. Halt on state drift: iftasks[active_task_id]reads"done", halt; report and make no changes. Read the plan## Goaland active task section — including itsIntent— from.spae/current/PLAN.md. Read dependent and forward task titles plus acceptance criteria to map seams, not build them. Verify every task ID in the active task'sDependenciesfield carries status"done"intasksregistry inSTATE.json; fail the task for any incomplete dependency. - ORIENT—State the goal in one sentence: execute the active task
and hand off to
/check. Name what won't change:PLAN.md,SPEC.md, and forward-task seams. Task status update: settasks[active_task_id]to"in_progress"in.spae/current/STATE.json. - PLAN—Declare the full implementation path that satisfies every
acceptance criterion, advances the task
Intentand plan## Goal, and leaves seams for forward tasks. Readreferences/testing-guide.md,references/shell-command-guide.md, andreferences/cleanup-guide.md. Map the test surface per criterion: expected behaviors, failure modes, and edge cases. Choose among valid implementations by goal fit, not local convenience. - ACT—Iterate over every acceptance criterion:
- Write a failing test: expected behavior, failure modes, and edge cases.
- Write minimal code to pass it.
- Drive green; repeat
test→implementuntil the criterion passes.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 222 lines · 21 tokens per session scan C 58da4d53ec59
spae-build is a skill published in the GitHub repository mystilleef/spae-framework (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,186 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (hidden instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ahk-test
Design, write, and run behavior-focused tests for an objective or existing code. Writes test files only and reports evidence. No tasks created, no harness tracking.
ahk-review
Preview a code review against ticket/objective alignment, with deep semantic (name-vs-behavior) analysis. No tasks created, no harness tracking.
ahk-use-cases
Define or refine a feature, change, refactor, or user journey as an approved non-technical use-case specification.
ahk-triage
Triage a bug or unexpected behavior. Deep diagnostic analysis with structured report. No tasks created, no harness tracking.
ahk-use-case-tech
Turn an approved use-case specification into a linked, evidence-backed technical specification.
design-review-cycle
Run evidence-backed design, specification, and implementation-plan reviews through the local llm-cli-gateway stdio MCP server. Use for single-provider or complete cross-LLM design review before implementation. Covers all seven CLI request surfaces and Mistral Vibe's current accept-edits default.