Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MythicAgents/sage --skill sage-eval-gaugegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MythicAgents/sageWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mythicagents/sage/sage-eval-gauge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mythicagents/sage/sage-eval-gauge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mythicagents/sage/sage-eval-gauge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mythicagents/sage/sage-eval-gauge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mythicagents/sage/sage-eval-gauge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00108 | $0.08666 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.03466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01733 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00867 |
Grade A, and why
sage-eval-gauge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
41 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- gate_configs.example.json 421 B
- references/matrix-cohort-driver.md 31 KB
- scripts/accounting.py 354 B runs code
- scripts/bh_cypher.py 1.5 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_composite_bridge.py 9.6 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_episode_compiler.py 15 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_event_buffer.py 7.8 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_event_projection.py 8.6 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_ledger_source.py 9.2 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_live_facts.py 24 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_native_actions.py 17 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_operator_inputs.py 4.8 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_os_network.py 14 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_os_writes.py 15 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_redaction.py 5.7 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_risk_inventory.py 56 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_secret_registration.py 2.3 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_service_probe.py 59 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_sink_sources.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/capture_tradecraft_facts.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/diagnostic_isolation.py 3.4 KB runs code
- scripts/diagnostic_loopback_relay.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/diagnostic_service_isolation.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/matrix_route_smoke.py 8.6 KB runs code
- scripts/native_inventory.py 19 KB runs code
- scripts/observation_receiver.py 14 KB runs code
- scripts/orchestrate.py 170 KB runs code
- scripts/phoenix_startup_probe.py 38 KB runs code
- scripts/prepare_evaluation_candidates.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/prepare_metered_launcher.py 6.0 KB runs code
- scripts/process_observer.py 40 KB runs code
- scripts/qualify_capture_lifecycle.py 22 KB runs code
- scripts/reanalyze_trust_walker.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/reset_recover.py 35 KB runs code
- scripts/run_capture_episode.py 72 KB runs code
- scripts/run_development_measurement.py 338 B runs code
- scripts/run_matrix_cohort.py 70 KB runs code
- scripts/run_metered_python.py 5.1 KB runs code
- scripts/run_trust_walker_pilot.py 264 KB runs code
- scripts/summarize_comparison.py 8.8 KB runs code
- scripts/verify_claims.py 1.5 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +233 lines 978fe2bc8b8b
- 2mo ago First seen · 156 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 6905a94d3a45
sage-eval-gauge is a skill published in the GitHub repository MythicAgents/sage (31 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 8,666 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
mem0-test-integration
Verify a Mem0 integration produced by /mem0-integrate. Runs in the same workspace on the same branch (loose coupling) — installs dependencies, runs the repo's native test suite, then exercises a real end-to-end smoke flow against the user's API key. Produces a scorecard. TRIGGER when: user has just run /mem0-integrate…
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
mantis-reproduce
Generates and runs crash reproducers to verify security flaws. Use when viable findings exist and you need to write and execute a script or payload to verify the crash. Don't use for code auditing or patching.
evaluating-with-leakage-gates
Evaluate an OpenMed de-identification or clinical NER model against the leakage-first release gates G1a through G8, which gate releases on residual PHI leakage rather than on F1. Use when the user wants to run the OpenMed eval harness on a synthetic golden set, decide whether a de-id model is RELEASABLE or…