Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/myths-labs/muse/executing-plansnpx skills add myths-labs/muse --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/myths-labs/museWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/myths-labs/muse/executing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/myths-labs/muse/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/myths-labs/muse/executing-plans.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to Executing Plans — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
Core principle: Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Batch
Default: First 3 tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
- Show what was implemented
- Show verification output
- Say: "Ready for feedback."
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker mid-batch (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Between batches: just report and wait
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 77 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 582937183ad9
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository myths-labs/muse (32 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 479 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to Executing Plans, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-brain
Triggers (all require explicit user request — do NOT activate just because a brain/ folder exists): (1) The user wants to set up project-level memory ("set up project brain", "scaffold project context", "init project brain", "建项目脑"). (2) The user is in a directory containing brain/ AND explicitly asks to resume /…
context-receipts
Emit privacy-safe receipts for context selection, deferral, hydration, compaction, pruning, delegation, usage attribution, and boundary handoffs.
engram
Local-first personal AI identity and memory layer for MCP-compatible coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and others). Use this skill when the user wants to continue from a previous session ("continue from last session", "pick up where we left off"), recall a past decision ("what did we decide", "what was our…
evidence-attestation
Emit privacy-safe evidence attestations for agent actions, reviews, memory answers, handoffs, scores, approvals, and tool dispatches.
skill-policy-receipts
Use when a task must obey a hard project policy, such as "do not generate tests for internal services", "do not call production APIs", or "do not edit generated files". Emits a privacy-safe receipt before writes and after guard checks.
testsprite-verify
TestSprite verification loop — after finishing a feature or fix in a TestSprite-tested repo, use the testsprite CLI to run the relevant TestSprite tests against the change and inspect any failure artifacts before reporting the work as done. Use whenever code has changed outside docs/config and is about to be reported…