Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/requesting-code-review-codexnpx skills add mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex --skill requesting-code-review-codexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/requesting-code-review-codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/requesting-code-review-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/requesting-code-review-codex.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00665 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review-codex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requesting Code Review
Call the codex_review MCP tool to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Pass a structured prompt with the scope and reviewStyle fields matching the review type needed.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
When to Request Review
Mandatory:
- After each task in subagent-driven development
- After completing major feature
- Before merge to main
Optional but valuable:
- When stuck (fresh perspective)
- Before refactoring (baseline check)
- After fixing complex bug
How to Request
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Call codex_review:
Use one of these call shapes:
Structured review (base diff — requires base or commit scope; not available for uncommitted):
{
"tool": "codex_review",
"arguments": {
"taskId": "task-17-review",
"reviewStyle": "structured",
"scope": { "kind": "base", "base": "origin/main" },
"prompt": "Review Task 4 from docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-03-agent-forwarding.md for correctness, regressions, and missing tests.",
"workspaceRoot": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo"
}
}
Advisory review (base diff):
{
"tool": "codex_review",
"arguments": {
"taskId": "task-17-advisory",
"reviewStyle": "advisory",
"scope": { "kind": "base", "base": "origin/main" },
"prompt": "Give concise advisory feedback on the diff since origin/main.",
"workspaceRoot": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo"
}
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 177 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 8c62ed6058e3
requesting-code-review-codex is a skill published in the GitHub repository mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude-code-session-broker
Use when running Arcgentic V2 in Claude Code and fixed Planner, Developer, and Auditor role sessions must be coordinated through a broker.
arcgentic
Use when the user says Arcgentic, asks to use Arcgentic, or wants an idea taken through a complete plan → development → self-audit → external audit workflow in Codex.
espalier-migrate
Migrate an existing harness/espalier install to the current Espalier version — auto-detects which of v0.1→v0.2, v0.3→v0.4, v0.4→v0.5, the v0.5.3 coder-agent patch, v0.5→v0.6 (Stage 1 grill), v0.6→v0.7 (read-only /espalier-ask lane), v0.7→v0.8 (requirements approval gate), the v0.8.1 impact-analysis agent patch, the…
verify-gates
Runs the mechanical quality gates that the arcgentic state machine requires for state transitions. Invoked indirectly by transition.sh OR directly by orchestrator agent before declaring a state transition. Use when about to call transition.sh OR when manually verifying that a round artifact meets the gate criteria.…
session-mode
Use when a project has not yet stored session mode, when a user asks for complete arcgentic workflow execution, or when role identity handoff prompts are needed.
agency-roster
Use when a round references agency-agents catalogs, role-family routing, multi-agent identity prompts, or English/Chinese specialist role catalogs.