Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/n24q02m/claude-plugins/memory-commitnpx skills add n24q02m/claude-plugins --skill memory-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/n24q02m/claude-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01065 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
memory-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to memory-commit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Memory Commit
Manual capture of a single decision, preference, fact, skill, task, or
conversation snippet into mnemo. Enforces the "WHY not just WHAT" rule
and chooses the correct context_type so retrieval is precise.
When to Use
Trigger on explicit user signals:
- "remember this", "save this", "save for next time"
- "ghi nho", "luu lai", "nho lai"
- "let's commit this to memory", "store this"
- After a deliberate decision: "we picked X because Y"
- After a stated preference: "I always want X"
- After correcting the agent: high-value capture (prevents repeat)
Do NOT trigger on incidental mentions or speculative options not yet chosen.
Steps
-
Identify the content the user wants to remember:
- Preceding 1-3 messages (default), OR
- A specific quoted span the user references, OR
- The current selection if invoked via slash command
-
Determine
context_typevia this decision tree:Signal context_type "we decided", "we picked X over Y", "going with" decision"I prefer", "I always want", "default to" preference"X is at version Y", env vars, API shapes, file locations fact"to do X you run Y then Z", procedure, how-to skill"todo", "remember to", deadline, "by Friday" tasknone of the above (general context) conversationWhen ambiguous, ask the user one short question. Do not silently default to
conversationfor high-signal content. -
Compose the capture text with WHY included:
- BAD: "Use Polars"
- GOOD: "Use Polars for dataframes (not pandas) because the codebase processes 50M-row datasets and Polars is 20x faster than pandas in our benchmark."
-
Capture via the typed action:
memory(action="capture", text="<composed text>", context_type="<chosen type>", category="<project-name or topic>", tags=["<topic>", "<scope>"]) -
Confirm to the user:
Saved as <context_type>. Memory ID: <id>. (Deduplicated against existing similar memory: <existing_id>.) # if applicable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 112 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 241884a0c81c
memory-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository n24q02m/claude-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,065 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to memory-commit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
persona-triggers
페르소나 v5 트리거 상세(AT 20패턴 + 15관점 매핑·매칭 예시). 관점·객관적·철저·깊이·검증·추천·디버깅·방향·진행·근거·출처·사례·팩트·증거 등 트리거 단어 감지 시 상세 참조.
persona-format
페르소나 v5 L2/L3 응답 형식 — 15관점 활성·문제해결 절차·7섹션 템플릿·자가검증·fail-safe·금지원칙. 코드 변경·디버깅·구현 등 L2/L3 작업 시 로드.
persona-accountant
15년+ 회계·세무 전문가 페르소나(#14) 깊은 도메인. 회계·세무·세금·종합소득세·부가가치세·원천징수·경비처리·세금계산서·절세·사업자등록·기장·손금·소득공제·세액공제·홈택스·국세청 맥락 시 활성.
persona-marketer
15년+ 마케팅·세일즈 전문가 페르소나(#15) 깊은 도메인. 마케팅·세일즈·카피·콘텐츠·SEO·광고·랜딩페이지·전환·퍼널·브랜딩·포지셔닝·리드·캠페인·리텐션·그로스·어카운트·컨설팅 맥락 시 활성.
persona-safety
페르소나 v5 안전 작업 — 보안 always-on·비가역 작업 게이트·코드 메타규칙·모바일 UI(375px) 검증·외부도구 도입검토. 코드/UI/보안/배포/삭제/force push 작업 시 로드.
persona-lawyer
15년+ 전문 변호사 페르소나(#11) 깊은 도메인. 법률·계약·면책·규제·약관·audit·자본시장법·GDPR·개인정보·저작권·라이선스·AML·컴플라이언스 맥락 시 활성.