Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add naderelewa/Product-to-Prod/plugin install product2prodWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naderelewa/product-to-prod/pm-gtm-v1)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naderelewa/product-to-prod/pm-gtm-v1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naderelewa/product-to-prod/pm-gtm-v1/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naderelewa/product-to-prod/pm-gtm-v1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naderelewa/product-to-prod/pm-gtm-v1.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00189 | $0.03404 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00095 | $0.01702 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00681 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00340 |
Grade A, and why
pm-gtm-v1 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
pm-gtm-v1, source of truth → fresh gate state → phase-gated plan → config-only rows
Input is a go-to-market goal: a launch, a period, a plan refresh. Output is a plan package: a fresh gate-state snapshot, a plan built phase by phase, a campaign-architecture narrative, channel and tracking planning rows, and a handoff record for the owner and whoever runs marketing operations.
This verb plans. It never spends, never posts, never configures a platform, and never touches a tag container. Execution stays human; implementation stays engineering's.
Seam discipline: this verb emits no engineering seam artifacts. When technical work emerges from
planning, a pixel install, a container change, instrumentation, landing pages, it leaves as
classified candidate rows routed to /pm-requirements-v1 (a single item) or /pm-portfolio-v1 (a
batch). One seam, one owner.
Preflight (run first)
PKG_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${PKG_ROOT:-}}"
[ -n "$PKG_ROOT" ] && [ -r "$PKG_ROOT/.claude-plugin/plugin.json" ] || { echo "STOP: set PKG_ROOT to this package's root directory, the one holding .claude-plugin/plugin.json, then re-run."; exit 2; }
bash "$PKG_ROOT/scripts/preflight.sh" pm-gtm-v1 [--stack <keys>]
Conditional keys: gate-state-snapshot (the read-only analytics reads that let a gate state be
measured rather than asserted) · workspace-docs · backlog-sync. A selected-conditional miss
blocks like a required one.
Standalone vs supercharged. Standalone (python3): the full chain resolve, the phase-gated plan,
the campaign narrative and the config-only rows, with every unprobeable gate state written
NEEDS-CONFIRMATION with a named confirmer, never guessed. Supercharged: gate-state-snapshot
turns those rows into measured states.
There is deliberately no advertising-platform capability. Nothing here holds or requests ad-account credentials, which is precisely why the rows in step 4 are configuration proposals rather than changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 230 lines · 189 tokens per session scan A 2ff0ff167587
pm-gtm-v1 is a skill published in the GitHub repository naderelewa/Product-to-Prod (43 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 189 tokens to every session and 3,404 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
meta-tags-optimizer
Optimize title tags, meta descriptions, Open Graph, and Twitter cards for maximum click-through rate. Generates multiple A/B test variations with character counting and SERP preview. Use when asked to "optimize title tag", "write meta description", "improve CTR", "Open Graph tags", "fix my meta tags", "social media…
google-ads-audit
Google Ads account audit and business context setup. Use for account-health audits and business-context setup. Trigger on "audit my ads", "ads audit", "set up my ads", "onboard", "account overview", "how's my account", "ads health check", "what should I fix in my ads", or when the user is new to NotFair and hasn't run…
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO) — the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the full journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: SERP click-through factors (title/meta/rich results that win the click), then post-click experience signals that keep users and drive conversions — above-the-fold relevance and…
critical-code-reviewer
Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.
shiny-bslib
Build modern Shiny dashboards and applications using bslib (Bootstrap 5). Use when creating new Shiny apps, modernizing legacy apps (fluidPage, fluidRow/column, tabsetPanel, wellPanel, shinythemes), or working with bslib page layouts, grid systems, cards, value boxes, navigation, sidebars, filling layouts, theming…
elixir-idioms
OTP/BEAM patterns and Elixir idioms — GenServer, Supervisor, Task, Registry, pattern matching, with chains, pipes. Use when designing processes or debugging BEAM issues.