Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add naiersaidane/claude-mastery --skill cadregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naiersaidane/claude-masteryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naiersaidane/claude-mastery/cadre)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naiersaidane/claude-mastery/cadre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naiersaidane/claude-mastery/cadre/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naiersaidane/claude-mastery/cadre"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naiersaidane/claude-mastery/cadre.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00154 | $0.00964 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00482 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
cadre scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tu interroges l'utilisateur pour produire ou étendre docs/PRD.md selon le template ci-dessous.
Process
-
Explore le repo si nécessaire pour comprendre le contexte existant (
CLAUDE.md, ADRs, glossaire métier, code adjacent). Réutilise le vocabulaire du projet dans le PRD et respecte les décisions architecturales déjà tranchées. Si la réponse à une question se trouve dans le repo, explore plutôt que de demander. -
Si
docs/PRD.mdexiste, lis-le. Croise avec le brief reçu et n'interroge que sur les deltas. Confronte les contradictions : « Tu avais tranché X, le brief suggère Y, on garde lequel ? ». Pas de PRD et pas de brief → ta première question est « Qu'est-ce que tu veux cadrer ? ». -
Interroge une question à la fois, avec ta recommandation justifiée. Suis les dépendances : Problème → Utilisateur cible → Solution → Critères → Hors périmètre. User Stories et Décisions d'implémentation émergent en transverse. Avant de basculer, demande « Quelque chose pour Notes complémentaires : risques, dépendances, hypothèses ? ».
-
Quand chaque section peut être rédigée sans trou, annonce-le en une phrase et écris le PRD complet dans le chat selon le template. Les User Stories sont synthétisées à ce moment à partir des autres réponses et présentées à valider.
-
Le user valide ou corrige section par section. Sur correction, re-poste uniquement la section touchée. Une fois tout validé, écris
docs/PRD.md(créedocs/au besoin) et confirme « ✓ écrit dansdocs/PRD.md».
Problème
Ce que vit l'utilisateur : frustration, contexte, « pourquoi maintenant ». Prose en 3ème personne, pas en je.
Solution
Direction produit du point de vue de l'utilisateur : ce que le produit lui permet de faire, pas comment c'est construit.
Utilisateur cible
Profil + contexte d'usage, suffisamment précis pour imaginer une personne réelle.
User Stories
Liste numérotée exhaustive au format « En tant que <acteur>, je veux <fonctionnalité>, afin de <bénéfice> ». Couvre interactions principales, états vides, erreurs, parcours alternatifs, cas limites.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 60 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A 85a777b1b3d8
cadre is a skill published in the GitHub repository naiersaidane/claude-mastery (51 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 964 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
geekx-gate
A review framework for deciding whether an engineering idea or technical commitment is necessary, too broad, or premature. It examines the real problem, complexity, evidence, non-goals, and ease of reversal.
geekx-engineering
A set of engineering instructions for making substantial changes in an existing codebase. It emphasizes understanding the affected system, keeping a persistent plan, and recording decisions and evidence.
geekx-grilling
A questioning workflow for pressure-testing plans, decisions, requirements, and proposed solutions. It asks one important question at a time and uses the answers to clarify facts, choices, dependencies, scope, and exclusions.
specmint-core
Persistent spec management for AI coding workflows. Use this skill when the user explicitly mentions specs, forging, or structured planning: says "forge", "forge a spec", "write a spec for X", "create a spec", "plan X as a spec", "resume", "what was I working on", "spec list/status/pause/switch/activate", "implement…
siti-grants
A guide to Taipei's SITI industry-development grants for companies, including funding for research, startups, branding, and related programmes. SITI is the Taipei City Government's industry-development funding office.
publisher
Publish HTML frontend projects to the PushWebly publishing platform, list published projects, obtain shareable project URLs, change a published app's public/private visibility, and package published HTML projects into Android APKs. Use when Codex needs to publish a local zip project, publish and build an APK, build an…