Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvementnpx agentmods add skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/subagent-driven-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/subagent-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/subagent-driven-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.07481 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.03741 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01496 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00748 |
Grade C, and why
subagent-driven-development scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
delete this plan's workspace (`rm -rf <workspace>`) — the git history is This is a copy
95% identical to subagent-driven-development — 599 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 569 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagent-Driven Development
Execute plan by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task, a task review (spec compliance + code quality) after each, and a broad whole-branch review at the end.
Why subagents: You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.
Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + task review (spec + quality) + broad final review = high quality, fast iteration
Narration: between tool calls, narrate at most one short line — the ledger and the tool results carry the record.
Continuous execution: Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are the four named below, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.
Rulings, not stalls. A running plan does not wait on a human. Conflicts,
ambiguities, plan defects, a cap you would have asked to exceed — decide
them. The spec is the binding authority, the plan is its argument, and your
judgment settles what neither answers. Record every decision in the ledger as
Ruling: <what you decided> — <why> — <what it costs if wrong>, and keep
going. A wrong ruling costs rework your human partner can see and undo; a
session parked on a question costs their whole day and buys nothing.
Four things stop you, and only these: an irreversible or destructive operation; a security-sensitive action; a side effect outside this worktree that norms say you ask about first (a merge, a push to a shared branch, a publish); and a plan so broken that every path forward is a guess. For those, stop and ask.
When to Use
digraph when_to_use {
"Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
"Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
"Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
"subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
"executing-plans" [shape=box];
"Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +289 lines scan A → C 8dd1b8e698ed
- 3d ago First seen · 280 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 905a2b9be59b
subagent-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 7,481 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). It is 95% identical to subagent-driven-development, differing in 599 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
opensrc
Fetch dependency source code to give AI agents deeper implementation context. Use when the agent needs to understand how a library works internally, read source code for a package, fetch implementation details for a dependency, or explore how an npm/PyPI/crates.io package is built. Triggers include "fetch source for"…
nopus-configure
Configure nopus complexity sensitivity, extra-simple rewrites, rewrite evidence, and Pi response hiding for this user.
agentpush
Bridge an imported agentpush MCP server (Telegram, WhatsApp, etc.) with live agentproto sessions via the daemon's transmitter subsystem: transmitmessage sends outbound and binds the recipient to a session, inboundwatcherstart polls agentpush for new messages, and inboundendpointcreate/POST /inbound(/:slug) route…
bureau
Drive Bureau — the browser stack's installable capability server: a stealth Firefox (Camofox) + daemon that exposes browser tools as MCP-over-HTTP on :8830, plus a CLI for saved browser identities (sessions), social capture / search, adapter health probes, declarative workflows, and Guilde connection. Use when working…
agentproto-apps
Operate and build Agentproto apps — AIP-42 app bundles (defineApp().emit(dir), APP.md + agents/ + workflows/ + ui/) and their daemon lifecycle (appinstall, appapply, apprun, appstatus, appstop) plus the app-scoped durable data plane (appdataread/write/list/migrate). Covers serving one with a UI (agentproto app serve →…
agentproto-llm-endpoint
Use the local LLM endpoint proxy (localhost:18090) — or your own gated public deployment — to route Claude Code / Claude SDK through custom providers (OpenRouter, Moonshot, Groq, ZAI) via an Anthropic-compatible gateway. Covers adapter-specific behaviors, auth patterns, proxy codenames, and common failure modes.