Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nakshatra0707/small-council --skill auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nakshatra0707/small-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nakshatra0707/small-council/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nakshatra0707/small-council/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nakshatra0707/small-council/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nakshatra0707/small-council/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nakshatra0707/small-council/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00174 | $0.03041 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00087 | $0.01520 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00608 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00304 |
Grade B, and why
small-council-audit scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Tells the agent never to refusemediumAnti-refusal
Suppressing the ability to decline removes a core safety control; a later harmful request then succeeds.
isn't a full-system review. Don't decline just because most of the architecture Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 270 lines · 174 tokens per session scan B 19b65a07d9c0
small-council-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nakshatra0707/small-council (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 174 tokens to every session and 3,041 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (tells the agent never to refuse). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
radin-review
Run a thermo-nuclear code quality review over a scope (commit, PR, directory, or a range like "since yesterday"), triage the findings with the user, and log the ones they keep as backlog entries instead of printing to terminal. Use for /radin-review, "review and log to backlog", "audit this commit/PR/directory and…
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.