namba-ai: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/namba-queue/SKILL.md

namba-queue is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Nam-Cheol/namba-ai. It costs 18 tokens per session (730 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for operating an existing-SPEC work queue, where SPEC means a written project specification.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for moving specified tasks through an existing Namba queue.
Why use it?
It organizes implementation work that has already been described in specifications and may update repository or GitHub state.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions Codex; $skill-name invocation.

This is Nam-Cheol/namba-ai's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on namba-ai itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything namba-ai configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Nam-Cheol/namba-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nam-Cheol/namba-ai/main/.agents/skills/namba-queue/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nam-Cheol/namba-ai

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for namba-queue

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for namba-queue

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-queue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.00730
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00292
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00073

Measured 2mo ago against content hash e71993b20a2b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

namba-queue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/namba-queue/SKILL.md · 32 lines

What it actually says

State effect: mutating workflow entry point. Use help/probe paths read-only, and otherwise expect repository state or GitHub state to change.

Generated instruction contract for this command skill:

  • Purpose: keep the role or command scope explicit, bounded, and testable.
  • Boundary: honor read-only versus mutating state effects, configured sandbox mode, and assigned file or workflow ownership.
  • Required output: report concrete actions, changed paths or artifacts, validation evidence, and pass/fail status or blockers.
  • Pass/fail criteria: claim success only when acceptance criteria and configured validation are satisfied; otherwise name the exact blocker and impact.
  • Evidence expectations: cite source artifacts such as SPEC files, .namba/ configs, diffs, test output, PR/check links, or generated manifests instead of relying on unsupported assertions.
  • Security responsibilities: never expose or commit secrets; treat auth, privacy, destructive commands, permission changes, and external network or credential use as security-sensitive.
  • Destructive command and escalation policy: do not run destructive commands unless explicitly requested; request approval for privileged, networked, or sandbox-blocked actions only when the active approval mode allows it, and otherwise report the blocker or use a safe non-escalating path.
  • Fallback implementer boundary: if a specialist path is unavailable and the main/default implementer takes over, stay within the assigned scope and preserve the same evidence and validation duties.
  • Portability: keep durable guidance non-project-specific unless the current repository config or SPEC explicitly provides the project detail.

Use this skill when the user explicitly says $namba-queue, namba queue, or asks to process multiple existing SPEC packages in order.

Behavior:

  • Prefer the installed namba queue CLI when available because queue state and Git/GitHub evidence are durable CLI-owned outputs.
  • Only consume already-existing SPEC packages. Do not create new SPEC packages from this command surface.
  • namba queue start <SPEC-RANGE|SPEC-LIST> accepts ranges such as SPEC-001..SPEC-003 and explicit lists such as SPEC-001 SPEC-004, plus --auto-land, --review, deprecated --skip-codex-review, and --remote origin.
  • Use namba queue status [--verbose] to report active SPEC, durable state, blocker or wait reason, evidence path, PR link, and next safe command before deciding how to resume.
  • Use namba queue resume only after checking or resolving the current wait/blocker state; use pause and stop as cooperative controls that preserve branches, PRs, and evidence.
  • Treat .namba/logs/queue/ as the durable queue state and report surface.
  • Continue one active SPEC at a time through review, implementation, validation, active-SPEC-aware sync/PR, checks, optional land, and local main refresh.
  • Block instead of skipping on failed validation, failed checks, non-mergeable PRs, dirty queue branches, GitHub auth failures, missing gh, diverged branches, ambiguous PR/check state, or unclear review readiness.
  • Without --auto-land, stop in waiting_for_land after green and mergeable PR evidence so the operator can land intentionally.
  • Queue PR handoff does not request Codex review unless --review is present; keep --skip-codex-review as deprecated compatibility syntax only, and never combine it with --review.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A e71993b20a2b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

namba-queue is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nam-Cheol/namba-ai (11 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autofix-pr

Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…

QwenLM/qwen-code · 123 tokens

create-issue

Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.

QwenLM/qwen-code · 26 tokens

simplify

Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .

QwenLM/qwen-code · 63 tokens

issue-creation

Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 30 tokens

queue-handoff

Use when ending a turn, finishing a slice, blocked on another agent's work, or escalating to a human — durable work handoff via queue items so the system keeps moving across compactions, missed messages, and interruptions. Covers the hot-potato terminal-turn-rule (active work ends by passing the ball, not by going…

mvschwarz/openrig · 94 tokens

systemic-issue-triage

Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 57 tokens