Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nanparth/ai-skill-hub --skill legal-diagramgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nanparth/ai-skill-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nanparth/ai-skill-hub/legal-diagram)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nanparth/ai-skill-hub/legal-diagram"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nanparth/ai-skill-hub/legal-diagram/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nanparth/ai-skill-hub/legal-diagram"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nanparth/ai-skill-hub/legal-diagram.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.02282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00456 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
legal-diagram scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/legal-diagram
Standalone skill: turn legal material into a context-appropriate Mermaid diagram, with an optional downloadable HTML figure. A structure-preserving Python engine extracts a typed ground truth; directive-driven LLM enrichment fills the gaps; a selector picks the diagram type; the diagram is generated natively.
Routing gate
Every real diagram request runs in this fixed order: first-run check, ingest, build-mode gate, generate, report gate. Non-diagram intents short-circuit at Step 0.
Three human gates = mandatory hard stops: GATE 0 (tutorial offer), GATE A (build mode), GATE B (HTML report). Gate discipline, no exceptions:
- Present each as structured choice (the question tool). No such tool → numbered plain-text list. Either way, STOP, wait for reply.
- Never skip a gate. Never infer its answer from wording. Never generate past an unanswered gate. Detailed, specific, or named-diagram request = still a request, not a gate answer.
- Only a literal typed flag may pre-answer:
--direct/--guided(GATE A),--html(GATE B),--tutorial(tutorial). Nothing else counts.
Step 0 — Intent and first-run
Check explicit short-circuits first:
- Tutorial signals: "tutorial", "show me how", "first time", "demo", "walk me through",
--tutorial. → Loadworkflows/tutorial.md. Stop here. - Setup signals: "check setup", "install deps", "is setup ready". → Load
shared/setup-check.md, runcheck_setup.py, report. Stop here.
Otherwise this is a real diagram request (a file, pasted text, or a matter description). Detect first-run:
Run python scripts/first_run.py. Parse {state}: returning, first_run, or unknown. Script absent, non-zero exit, or no JSON → treat as unknown.
returning(confirmed) → no offer; user ran skill before. Continue to Step 1.first_run,unknown, or anything not a confirmedreturning→ GATE 0 (hard stop): "First time here. Want a quick tutorial, or go straight to your diagram?" Options: Start tutorial (recommended, list first) / Skip, straight to my diagram. Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then STOP, wait for reply. After answer, runpython scripts/first_run.py --markto record offer (best-effort; onunknownstate with no writable disk, mark may not persist, fine). Then: tutorial → loadworkflows/tutorial.md, stop; skip → continue to Step 1.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/html_template.html 56 KB
- constraints.txt 308 B
- legal-diagram-readme.md 31 KB
- LICENSE 1.0 KB
- PORTABILITY.md 4.8 KB
- references/extraction-schema.md 4.6 KB
- requirements.txt 177 B
- scripts/check_setup.py 1.6 KB runs code
- scripts/diagram_selector.py 34 KB runs code
- scripts/eval_pass2.py 2.8 KB runs code
- scripts/extract_entities.py 5.3 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/__init__.py 388 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/context.py 3.5 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/__init__.py 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/compliance.py 610 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/core.py 5.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/corporate.py 431 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/litigation.py 759 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/domain/result.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/engine.py 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/evaluation.py 19 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/handoff.py 8.4 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/__init__.py 71 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/_patterns.py 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/base.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/citations.py 28 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/conditions.py 720 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/consent.py 2.4 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/controls.py 5.9 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/deadlines.py 8.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/documents.py 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/entities.py 7.8 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/events.py 7.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/notices.py 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/obligations.py 39 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/ownership.py 1.4 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/parties.py 14 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/party_mentions.py 6.3 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/payments.py 4.0 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/remedies.py 821 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/reps.py 792 B runs code
- scripts/extraction/harvesters/tables.py 5.6 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/helpers/__init__.py 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/helpers/dates.py 1.4 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/helpers/money.py 2.0 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/helpers/scoring.py 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/helpers/subjects.py 2.5 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/language.py 4.6 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/lexicon.py 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/lexicon/__init__.py 5.9 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/lexicon/base.py 6.6 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/lexicon/en.py 19 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/lexicon/fr.py 23 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/manifest.py 6.1 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/materialize.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/patching.py 22 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/resolver.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/schema.py 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/extraction/utils.py 14 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 112 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A cde698ebf3b7
legal-diagram is a skill published in the GitHub repository nanparth/ai-skill-hub (23 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 2,282 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…