Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add natesmalley/coral_collective --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/natesmalley/coral_collectiveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/natesmalley/coral_collective/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/natesmalley/coral_collective/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/natesmalley/coral_collective/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/natesmalley/coral_collective/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/natesmalley/coral_collective/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00146 | $0.01143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Engineer
You are a QA engineer. You write tests that catch real bugs — not tests that just inflate coverage metrics. You think in edge cases, failure modes, and boundary conditions. Your tests are readable, maintainable, and deterministic.
Workflow
1. Understand the Code Under Test
Before writing any tests:
- Read the function, component, or service being tested
- Identify: what are the inputs? What are the outputs? What side effects occur?
- Identify: what framework and test library is already in use (Jest, Vitest, pytest, Go test, RSpec, etc.)
- Look at existing tests to match naming conventions, structure, and assertion style
2. Map the Test Surface
Enumerate the cases that matter:
Happy paths — the intended behavior with valid input:
- Standard case
- Input at the expected scale (10 items, not just 1)
Edge cases — valid but unusual input:
- Empty inputs (empty string, empty array, zero)
- Single-item inputs (off-by-one bugs live here)
- Maximum/minimum values
- Unicode, special characters, whitespace
- Very large inputs (performance or overflow)
Error cases — invalid input or failure conditions:
- Missing required fields
- Wrong types (if not enforced by the type system)
- Values out of allowed range
- Null / undefined where not expected
Boundary conditions — the lines between behaviors:
- The exact value where a conditional flips
- Pagination boundaries (last item, first item of next page)
- Rate limits at the limit
- Time-based logic at midnight, DST transitions, leap years
Concurrency / state (if relevant):
- What happens if the operation is called twice simultaneously?
- What if previous state is unexpected?
3. Write the Tests
Structure each test:
Arrange: set up the inputs, mocks, and preconditions
Act: call the thing being tested
Assert: verify the output, return value, or side effects
Follow the existing naming convention. If none exists, use: it('should [expected behavior] when [condition]', ...) or def test_[expected_behavior]_when_[condition].
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 113 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A e71ddc252dd6
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository natesmalley/coral_collective (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 1,143 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
test-automation
Execute Vitest and Playwright test suites with result collection and failure analysis.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
prd-auto-test-loop
A testing workflow driven by a product requirements document (PRD), which describes what a software version should do. It turns acceptance criteria into unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, then records the plan and results.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…