Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Nauro-AI/nauro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nauro-AI/nauro/main/.agents/skills/nauro-loop/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nauro-AI/nauroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauro-ai/nauro/nauro-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauro-ai/nauro/nauro-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nauro-ai/nauro/nauro-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauro-ai/nauro/nauro-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nauro-ai/nauro/nauro-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00184 | $0.04858 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00074 | $0.01943 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00972 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00486 |
Grade A, and why
nauro-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Nauro loop skill
Run gated work origination and coordinate selected Program Delivery. The Program state machine is FRAME -> CHOOSE -> START -> ADVISE -> VERIFY -> ADVANCE. The coordinator owns the verified frame, sequence, handoff, advisory review, integration verification, and next recommendation. It does not implement, approve, file project truth, push, create a pull request, merge, or start the next slice.
User-named work enters as HUMAN-SELECTED. Agent-originated work keeps read-only ORIENT, 1-3 ranked Delivery and Interview candidates, mandatory SELECT, reject all, and no auto-pick path. Interview remains explicit, separate, and non-authoritative. Synchronous non-program Delivery stays outside the Program state machine and keeps the current nauro-ship-task chain.
Authority boundary
These are authority rules. MCP or shell write paths may exist, but they do not grant the coordinator authority to use them for Program Delivery.
- The loop cannot automatically change project truth or file decisions. Ordinary prompts, Interview results, Delivery handoffs, and program handbacks create no automatic store artifacts. The scheduled ORIENT selection-checkpoint writes are the narrow exception: they create only the existing SELECT checkpoint and pointer through the filesystem and
nauro syncmechanism defined below. A selected Interview returns candidate shared understanding only. After the interview, an explicitly approvedpropose_decision,update_state, orflag_questionpayload may be executed through/nauro-interviewaccording to its contract and separate later approval gates. Those writes belong to the interview contract, not loop authority. - The coordinator may inspect pull-request and merge state through read-only channels, including
gh pr viewor an equivalent authenticated read channel, only when a required PR-backed repository-anchor check needs it. This includes ORIENT, Resume, replacement-coordinator recovery, and VERIFY. Read-only inspection does not grant publication authority. The coordinator never pushes, creates or edits a pull request, merges, or performs another publication mutation. Only the direct-user Delivery task may perform approved publication work through its own gates. - The loop is NOT a "keep moving" override of any inner gate. A standing "keep going" or auto-mode directive does not clear the SELECT gate, the plan gate, a tech-lead pause, or the push gate. The loop exists to repeat the gated chain, not to bypass it.
- SELECT is never auto-picked. Neither entry mode picks for the human, not even when exactly one candidate ranks or when a scheduled continuation has one surviving candidate. The synchronous mode surfaces SELECT in the parent session; the scheduled mode parks a SELECT checkpoint and exits before any gate; the resume continuation surfaces SELECT to the human. No path resolves SELECT without the human.
- A hidden child, ordinary subagent, generic agent, or persistent Delivery child is not a substitute for a fresh direct-user Delivery task.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 166 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A 3f87beaf46c3
nauro-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nauro-AI/nauro (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 4,858 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
parallel-feature-development
Coordinate parallel feature development with file ownership strategies, conflict avoidance rules, and integration patterns for multi-agent implementation. Use this skill when decomposing a large feature into independent work streams, when two or more agents need to implement different layers of the same system…
saga-orchestration
Implement saga patterns for distributed transactions and cross-aggregate workflows. Use this skill when implementing distributed transactions across microservices where 2PC is unavailable, designing compensating actions for failed order workflows that span inventory, payment, and shipping services, building…
task-coordination-strategies
Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate multi-agent work with proper task descriptions and workload balancing. Use this skill when breaking down work for agent teams, managing task dependencies, or monitoring team progress.
bazel-build-optimization
Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.
nx-workspace-patterns
Configure and optimize Nx monorepo workspaces. Use when setting up Nx, configuring project boundaries, optimizing build caching, or implementing affected commands.
context-driven-development
Creates and maintains project context artifacts (product.md, tech-stack.md, workflow.md, tracks.md) in a conductor/ directory. Scaffolds new projects from scratch, extracts context from existing codebases, validates artifact consistency before implementation, and synchronizes documents as the project evolves. Use when…