slopsquat-preflight

slopsquat-preflight is a skill for Claude Code from nauta-ai/holster. It costs 74 tokens per session (351 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A preflight scanner for AI-generated code that checks for invented or misspelled package imports and unsafe permissions around an AI agent.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before running AI-written code, committing it, or shipping it; review high-severity findings and verify suspicious packages before installation.
Why use it?
It helps prevent supply-chain attacks from installing fake packages and catches excessive access to files, environment variables, or tool calls.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the holster-scan plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit Use it before running AI-written code, committing it, or shipping it; review high-severity findings and verify suspicious packages before installation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nauta-ai/holster --skill slopsquat-preflight
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nauta-ai/holster

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install holster-scan, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for slopsquat-preflight

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for slopsquat-preflight

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nauta-ai/holster/slopsquat-preflight.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 74 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 351 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00074 $0.00351
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.00176
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00070
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00035

Measured 10d ago against content hash cbf90be9f1e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

slopsquat-preflight scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/holster-scan/skills/slopsquat-preflight/SKILL.md · 15 lines

What it actually says

Before AI-generated code ships or an agent runs on this repo, scan it with holster-scan and report back.

  1. If holster-scan is not installed: pip install holster-scan.
  2. Run holster-scan <absolute-path-to-repo> (defaults to the current directory). It flags two things:
    • Hallucinated / typosquatted package imports - packages an AI may have invented (reqeusts, langchain-utils, panda) or published typosquats of popular packages. An attacker can register the hallucinated name, so installing it is a supply-chain risk.
    • Agent boundary issues - what an agent would inherit: a run wrapper passing the full shell env, an MCP fs-scope wider than the project, unbounded tool calls.
  3. Surface any high-severity findings plainly before the user proceeds; for a flagged package, do NOT install or trust it until verified on the real registry.
  4. --format sarif for CI / code-scanning; a .holster.yml allow: list suppresses known internal/vendor-index packages.

holster-scan runs entirely locally - the repo never leaves the machine. It is NOT generic SAST; it targets the risks unique to AI-generated code.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 15 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A cbf90be9f1e0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

slopsquat-preflight is a skill published in the GitHub repository nauta-ai/holster (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 351 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.