Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navapbc/digital-service-orchestranpx agentmods add skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-reportWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/test-quality-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
dso:test-quality-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Quality Report
Runs the calibration program health reports (monthly and quarterly) and surfaces their outputs.
Prerequisites
Calibration tracking tickets must exist. If they are absent, create them first:
bash .claude/scripts/dso-bootstrap-calibration-tickets.sh
Invocation
/dso:test-quality-report
Steps
Step 1: Run Monthly Report
.claude/scripts/dso calibration-report.sh monthly
Surface the full output to the user.
Step 2: Run Quarterly Report
.claude/scripts/dso calibration-report.sh quarterly
Surface the full output to the user.
Step 3: Summary
After both reports complete, provide a one-paragraph summary of the calibration program health, highlighting any trends, gaps, or action items surfaced by the reports.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A a7490d4fa1f4
dso:test-quality-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository navapbc/digital-service-orchestra (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.