Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nazarli-shabnam/clevis. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/main/.agents/skills/backend-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nazarli-shabnam/clevisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/backend-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/backend-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/backend-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/backend-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nazarli-shabnam/clevis/backend-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01365 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00682 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
backend-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 168 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A a032c9a81b93
backend-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nazarli-shabnam/clevis (101 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,365 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-design
Design public interfaces for libraries and tools that other people depend on. Use when designing or reviewing a public API surface, deciding what to export, naming functions and CLI flags, adding configuration options, planning deprecations, or when the user asks "is this a good API" or "how do I change this without…
task-land
Land a work item's pull request with Baron — take it out of draft and merge it. Use when the user says merge it / land it / birleştir / it's approved, ship this PR. Do NOT shell out to gh or az for this; Baron owns the provider call, including the parts that have no REST route.
7
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…