Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing --skill wcag-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/wcag-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/wcag-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/wcag-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/wcag-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/wcag-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02519 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01008 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00504 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
wcag-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 403 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WCAG Auditor Skill
This skill provides WCAG 2.1 accessibility audit capabilities, including criteria definitions, check implementations, and scoring logic.
Purpose
Systematically evaluate web pages against WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA success criteria to identify accessibility barriers and provide remediation guidance.
WCAG 2.1 Overview
WCAG is organized around four principles (POUR):
- Perceivable: Information must be presentable to users
- Operable: Interface must be usable
- Understandable: Information and operation must be understandable
- Robust: Content must be interpretable by assistive technologies
Conformance Levels
| Level | Description | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| A | Minimum | Essential accessibility |
| AA | Standard | Most common requirement |
| AAA | Enhanced | Highest accessibility |
This skill implements Level A and AA checks.
Check Implementation Guide
Using browser_evaluate for DOM Checks
Most WCAG checks can be performed via JavaScript evaluation:
// Example: Check for images without alt text
(function() {
const images = document.querySelectorAll('img');
const violations = [];
images.forEach(function(img) {
if (!img.hasAttribute('alt')) {
violations.push({
element: img.outerHTML.substring(0, 100),
selector: getSelector(img)
});
}
});
return { passed: violations.length === 0, violations: violations };
})();
Using browser_snapshot for Accessibility Tree
The accessibility snapshot provides:
- ARIA roles and properties
- Accessible names
- Focusable elements
- Heading structure
Parse the snapshot to verify semantic structure.
Using browser_press_key for Keyboard Tests
Tab through the page to verify:
- All interactive elements are reachable
- Focus order is logical
- No focus traps exist
Criteria Reference
Level A Criteria
1.1.1 Non-text Content
Requirement: All non-text content has a text alternative.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 403 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 13a9d97ee774
wcag-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing (21 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,519 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
age-inclusive-design
Design for users of all ages. Use when user asks to 'make accessible for older adults', 'improve age-inclusive design', 'help elderly users', 'reduce age-related friction', 'design for all ages', 'age-friendly interface'.
ux-researcher
!cat skills/shared/protocols/ux-protocol.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat skills/shared/protocols/design-mindset-and-rules.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat .production-grade.yaml 2>/dev/null || echo "No config — using defaults".
ux-principles
User experience design principles for developers.
ux-review
UX/UI Review & Mockup Feedback: Reviews user interfaces, mockups, and wireframes for usability, accessibility, consistency, and user experience best practices. Use whenever the user wants feedback on a UI design, mockup, wireframe, screenshot of their app, or mentions 'UX', 'UI', 'mockup', 'wireframe', 'user…
ux-principles
User research, usability heuristics, user psychology, accessibility, inclusive design, user testing, and UX metrics.
antislop-human
Human and accessibility skill for antislop. Contrast, keyboard, focus, and states for real people. Includes the contrast checker.