Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill codex-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/startup-os-skills/codex-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/startup-os-skills/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ncklrs/startup-os-skills/codex-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ncklrs/startup-os-skills/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ncklrs/startup-os-skills/codex-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00920 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00460 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
codex-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 118 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0720e8dc9f20
codex-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ncklrs/startup-os-skills (50 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 920 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verifying-claims
Check that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this…
reasoning-semiformally
Apply semi-formal certificate reasoning to code analysis — patch verification, fault localization, patch equivalence. Use when reviewing patches, hunting bugs across scopes, comparing fixes, or when code reasoning requires tracing execution across files/modules. Triggers on code review, bug localization, patch…
address-pr-review
Look at the pull request review comments and address any issues raised.
pr-buddy
Two-phase PR review companion. Phase 1: Socratic conversational walkthrough that builds the reviewer's mental model through guided questions — fighting cognitive debt by ensuring comprehension before approval. Phase 2: automated quality checks via pr-review-toolkit (Claude Code) or inline review (any host). Use when…
business-doc-generator
A tool for drafting business documents such as business plans, project proposals, market analysis reports, product requirement documents, pitch decks, and annual reports.
code-generator
A code-generation tool that creates project structures, templates, and implementations from a written description. It supports several programming languages, project types, frameworks, configuration files, and example tests.