Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nek1987/auto-agent-harness --skill integration-test-setupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nek1987/auto-agent-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nek1987/auto-agent-harness/integration-test-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nek1987/auto-agent-harness/integration-test-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nek1987/auto-agent-harness/integration-test-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nek1987/auto-agent-harness/integration-test-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nek1987/auto-agent-harness/integration-test-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00426 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
integration-test-setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 73 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 66c27f486e5e
integration-test-setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository nek1987/auto-agent-harness (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 426 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-reporting
Run the Level 2 dummy agent integration test suite and produce a detailed HTML report with per-test input → outcome analysis.
develop-web-game
Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with rendergametotext.
drive-automation-session
Drive an already-reserved Kobiton device from a natural-language intent. Opens an automation Appium session directly against the Kobiton WebDriver hub, runs an observe-decide-act loop with one action per iteration, pauses to ask the user when stuck (same-action repetition, screen unchanged, or model self-declared…
run-automation-suite
Run local Appium test scripts against Kobiton devices. Guides through app upload, device selection, capability parsing, and local execution. Use when the user asks to run mobile tests, validate an APK or IPA on Kobiton devices, or kick off an Appium suite from a local script directory. Trigger with "run kobiton tests"…
code-review
Use when reviewing a code change or diff for correctness, security, missing tests, and convention violations before opening or approving a PR. Review independently and adversarially, then fix high-confidence issues.
black-box-test
Use as an INDEPENDENT tester agent to test another agent's intesting ticket from the OUTSIDE — never your own, and never from the implementation diff. You test from the operational test contract + acceptance criteria only (never HOW it was built), writing automated tests that invoke the changed surfaces and recording…