Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NelsonBrandao/pi-agent-extensions --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NelsonBrandao/pi-agent-extensionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonbrandao/pi-agent-extensions/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonbrandao/pi-agent-extensions/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nelsonbrandao/pi-agent-extensions/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonbrandao/pi-agent-extensions/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nelsonbrandao/pi-agent-extensions/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00947 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Skill
Address PR review feedback for the current branch.
Workflow: Address Reviews
When asked to address PR reviews, follow this sequence:
1. Get PR context
gh pr view --json number,title,state,body,reviewDecision,headRefName,baseRefName,statusCheckRollup
2. Read unresolved review comments
Only fetch unresolved threads — ignore anything already resolved:
gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
pullRequest(number: $pr) {
reviewThreads(first: 100) {
nodes {
isResolved
comments(first: 10) {
nodes {
databaseId
author { login }
body
path
line
createdAt
diffHunk
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
' -f owner="{owner}" -f repo="{repo}" -F pr=<number> --jq '
.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[]
| select(.isResolved == false)
| .comments.nodes[]
| "ID: \(.databaseId)\nFile: \(.path):\(.line // "?")\nAuthor: \(.author.login) (\(.createdAt | split("T")[0]))\n\(.diffHunk | split("\n") | .[-3:] | map(" │ \(.)") | join("\n"))\n💬 \(.body)\n"
'
3. Check changed files
gh pr view --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.status) +\(.additions) -\(.deletions) \(.path)"'
4. Read diff for context
gh pr diff # full diff
gh pr diff | awk '/^diff --git.*<file>/{show=1} /^diff --git/ && !/'"<file>"'/{show=0} show' # single file
5. Make the code changes
Read the files mentioned in review comments and address the feedback.
6. Commit and push
Write a commit message that describes what actually changed, not just "address review feedback".
git add -A && git commit -m "Refactor auth middleware to validate tokens before routing" && git push
7. Resolve or reply to comments
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 138 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 49be4dcf2d4d
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository NelsonBrandao/pi-agent-extensions (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 947 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.