Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins --skill lintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 119 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 083a7c71ee19
lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nelsonochoam/nelsonochoam-claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-qa-fixes
Apply QA gate findings then hand back for re-review. Never self-approves or closes. Use when: apply QA fixes, remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS, /apply-qa-fixes.
code-review-excellence
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.
codebase-audit-pre-push
Deep audit before GitHub push: removes junk files, dead code, security holes, and optimization issues. Checks every file line-by-line for production readiness.
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
code-review-web
Review web application code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and stack-specific anti-patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review code, debug a production issue, investigate a build failure, audit security, or check a PR before merging. Triggers on code review, review my code, debug…