Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nesszer/linear-cli --skill linear-gitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nesszer/linear-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nesszer/linear-cli/linear-git)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nesszer/linear-cli/linear-git"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nesszer/linear-cli/linear-git/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nesszer/linear-cli/linear-git"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nesszer/linear-cli/linear-git.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
linear-git scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Git Operations
# Checkout branch for issue (creates if needed)
linear-cli g checkout LIN-123
# Show branch name
linear-cli g branch LIN-123
# Create branch without checkout
linear-cli g create LIN-123
# Create GitHub PR from Linear issue
linear-cli g pr LIN-123
linear-cli g pr LIN-123 --draft # Draft PR
linear-cli g pr LIN-123 --base main # Specify base branch
# jj (Jujutsu) - show commits with Linear trailers
linear-cli g commits
Context
# Get issue from current branch
linear-cli context
linear-cli context --output json
Flags
| Flag | Purpose |
|---|---|
--draft |
Create draft PR |
--base BRANCH |
Base branch |
--output json |
JSON output |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 1d05edc8587a
linear-git is a skill published in the GitHub repository nesszer/linear-cli (138 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
antfu-issue-triage
Triage open issues and PRs of the current GitHub repo - find already-fixed, duplicate, and spam items, suggest labels, gauge demand from reactions and comments, then present a table of proposed actions and comments for confirmation before touching anything. Use when asked to triage, organize, clean up, or groom issues…
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
shiplog
Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.
connect
Choose which wiki this session uses, the team project's pages on the Nimbalyst server or the project's local wiki of files, and connect a repository to its team project. Use at the start of a task before any wiki tool, when a wiki tool returns reponotbound, ambiguousproject, pinmismatch, projectnotaccessible…
llxprt-issue-workflow
Use this skill when asked to address, fix, or work on a GitHub issue in the llxprt-code repository. Covers the complete issue lifecycle - branch setup, gh CLI usage, test-first planning, subagent delegation and review loops, the full verification cycle (including the zai-glm-flash smoke test), open code review (ocr)…