rustdoc-authoring

rustdoc-authoring is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Netcracker/qubership-ai-packages. It costs 223 tokens per session (17,931 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A set of rules for writing comments and documentation in Rust code, including documentation examples that can be checked by the build.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for writing, editing, reviewing, and comparing Rust comments and documentation.
Why use it?
It helps Rust comments explain the right information without repeating guarantees already expressed by Rust’s types and signatures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for writing, editing, reviewing, and comparing Rust comments and documentation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Netcracker/qubership-ai-packages --skill rustdoc-authoring
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Netcracker/qubership-ai-packages

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Its marketplace also offers this one on its own, as the plugin rustdoc-authoring/plugin install rustdoc-authoring after adding the marketplace above.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rustdoc-authoring

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rustdoc-authoring

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netcracker/qubership-ai-packages/rustdoc-authoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 223 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 17,931 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00223 $0.17931
Opus 5 $0.00112 $0.08965
Sonnet 5 $0.00045 $0.03586
Haiku 4.5 $0.00022 $0.01793

Measured today against content hash c958fe86a1d5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rustdoc-authoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agent-packages/rustdoc-authoring/.apm/skills/rustdoc-authoring/SKILL.md · 1,202 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Authoring a Rust doc comment

This skill governs what a comment says and in what order. Wording, tone, sentence length, and dialect belong to english-developer-style: load it too, and defer to it on the prose. The two compose: this skill picks the slots; that one writes the sentences.

It is the Rust sibling of javadoc-authoring and godoc-authoring and keeps their section numbering, so a review that cites "§7b" means the same rubric in any of the three. Read this one for Rust; do not translate either of the others in your head. The slot model transfers unchanged. Three things do not, and they are the reason this file exists:

  • Rust's type system carries much of what a Java or Go comment has to state in prose. Option is the nullability rule, Result is the error list, ownership and &mut are the aliasing contract, Send and Sync are the threading model. §4 is mostly about what is left.
  • A doc example compiles and runs. The code in a doc comment is a test the build executes, so the strongest statement a Rust comment can make is a checked assertion rather than a claim (§6).
  • Nothing formats a doc comment for you. Measured on rustfmt 1.8.0, stable rustfmt leaves doc comments byte for byte alone: it does not reflow a 180-column line, does not normalize a list marker, does not fix indentation. wrap_comments and format_code_in_doc_comments are nightly-only and off. Where gofmt lets a Go author write content and forget layout, you own the layout here. Match the wrapping width the file already uses.

Everything measured below was measured on rustc, cargo 1.92.0, clippy 0.1.92, and rustfmt 1.8.0.

1. The correction that matters most

"Document the why, not the what" is half wrong for a doc comment, and the wrong half does the damage.

An inline // comment inside a function documents the why; it sits next to code the reader can already see. A doc comment on an item documents the contract: what a caller may rely on, what an implementer must guarantee, what holds before and after. That is a what at the level of a promise, not a restatement of the code.

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,202 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · -20 lines c958fe86a1d5
  2. 5d ago Changed · +274 lines · +12 tokens per session 1f341faa3152
  3. 10d ago First seen · 948 lines · 211 tokens per session scan A 2e1193a002fb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rustdoc-authoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository Netcracker/qubership-ai-packages (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 223 tokens to every session and 17,931 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories