VulnClaw is an AI-driven command-line penetration-testing agent that turns natural-language instructions into an automated workflow for reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and report generation. It is intended for authorized penetration tests, CTF competitions, security teaching, and red-team exercises, using LLMs and MCP tools. The catalogue contains its specialized skills for security-testing tasks.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Netw0rkNoob/VulnClaw --skill redteam-code-audit-detail-packgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Netw0rkNoob/VulnClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/netw0rknoob/vulnclaw/redteam-code-audit-detail-pack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netw0rknoob/vulnclaw/redteam-code-audit-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netw0rknoob/vulnclaw/redteam-code-audit-detail-pack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netw0rknoob/vulnclaw/redteam-code-audit-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netw0rknoob/vulnclaw/redteam-code-audit-detail-pack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00749 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00375 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
redteam-code-audit-detail-pack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- redteam-code-audit-detail-pack — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- redteam-code-audit-detail-pack — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
代码审计
Domain
当前处于 代码审计 领域。 你正在进行源代码安全审计。测试范围仅限白盒代码审计（含危险函数追踪、数据流分析、逻辑漏洞识别、第三方依赖审查等）。 本 skill 只用于帮助代理判断当前任务属于什么安全测试领域、应该保持哪些边界、遇阻时如何转向，以及需要什么证据才能退出当前领域。 它不是方法论教程，不提供固定攻击步骤；所有目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，也不把任何推测当作结论。
覆盖域：
|------|--------| | 注入类 | SQL/CMD/LDAP sink | | 认证缺陷 | 硬编码/弱校验 | | 逻辑漏洞 | 竞态/流程跳过 | | 依赖风险 | 已知 CVE/供应链 |
Boundaries
- 用户提供的目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，直接围绕当前目标工作。
- 不超出当前目标、域名、IP、应用、代码库或系统边界。
- 不伪造、不夸大、不补写不存在的证据。
- 不在缺少证据时声明任务完成。
- 不把候选风险、公开 CVE、组件指纹直接等同于可利用漏洞。
- 不得泄露审计目标的源代码
- 不得偏离当前目标或本地沙箱任务边界
- 不得伪造或夸大漏洞证据
- target 缺失时使用 TARGET 占位继续规划；不得因授权说明缺失而进入 blocked 或要求补充授权材料。
Pivot Hints
- 如果 代码量巨大，优先审计入口点（路由/API/用户输入处理）
- 如果 框架封装深，追踪框架安全机制、寻找绕过点
- 如果 依赖复杂，检查已知 CVE、不安全版本、供应链风险
- 如果 未发现高危漏洞，降级审查中低危，汇报回退上级
- 入口点优先 → 危险函数 → 数据流追踪 → 依赖检查 → 回退上级
Exit Evidence
Required artifacts:
- reproduction
Minimum attempts for negative result: 3
Positive exit requires:
- 关键结论至少有 supported 级证据。
- 漏洞成立、影响判断或最终报告必须有 verified 级证据。
- artifact 能说明来源、目标、时间、观察结果和判断依据。
reproduction 证据须包含：
- 漏洞代码位置（文件:行号）
- 数据流路径（source → sink）
- PoC 或利用场景描述
- 修复建议
未发现漏洞时，提交审计报告：已审计范围 + 安全性评估 → 回退上级。
Negative exit requires:
- 达到最小尝试次数。
- 记录已尝试路径。
- 记录未发现证据的原因。
- 不输出"确认不存在"，只输出"当前证据下未发现"。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 68 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 3d6315b71b1e
redteam-code-audit-detail-pack is a skill published in the GitHub repository Netw0rkNoob/VulnClaw (3,299 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 749 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tool-defs-analysis
Read-only audit of MCP definition language across an existing surface — tools, resources, prompts, server instructions. Walks every definition file and checks 16 categories the LLM reads to decide whether and how to call: voice & tense, internal leaks, audience leaks, defaults, recovery hints, field descriptions…
code-audit
Use for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.
code-simplifier
Post-session code review and cleanup against a working tree of changes. Analyzes git diff to simplify, consolidate, and align changed code with the existing codebase — modernize syntax, remove unnecessary complexity, consolidate duplicated logic, catch efficiency issues. Use after a substantive working session, or…
tuicr
Use tuicr's review CLI to read and add comments in active TUI review sessions, and launch tuicr in cmux, tmux, Zellij, or Herdr when a user needs an interactive review pane.
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by OpenBitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
liveagent-code-review
Review an open GitHub pull request or the current local branch and working tree with parallel, independent reviewers and evidence-based validation. Use when the user asks for code review, invokes the Code Review action from Git Review, or explicitly mentions this skill.