pkulaw-mcp-case-memo

pkulaw-mcp-case-memo is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills. It costs 153 tokens per session (1,199 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for turning Chinese legal case-search results into a short, traceable case memo for lawyers and dispute teams.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define a search question, select relevant cases, compare helpful and harmful points, record limitations, verify case numbers, and prepare a shareable memo.
Why use it?
It keeps case comparisons tied to returned case information and warns against treating a small sample as a general court rule.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to define a search question, select relevant cases, compare helpful and harmful points, record limitations, verify case numbers, and prepare a shareable memo.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills --skill pkulaw-mcp-case-memo
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pkulaw-mcp-case-memo

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pkulaw-mcp-case-memo

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 153 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,199 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00153 $0.01199
Opus 5 $0.00077 $0.00600
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00240
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00120

Measured 12d ago against content hash 3c4cf9fbf960, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pkulaw-mcp-case-memo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/pkulaw-mcp-case-memo/SKILL.md · 90 lines

What it actually says

北大法宝 MCP:Case Memo(类案检索报告/办案备忘)

这个 Skill 是案例检索后的交付层。 它的目标不是把案例结果堆成清单,而是把样本整理成一份可讨论、可流转、可追溯的类案备忘。

先看边界

  • 只适用于需要形成“样本 + 比较 + 结论线索”的类案备忘场景。
  • 如果用户只是想查单个案号、找某条案例原文,优先用更窄的检索或案号工具,不要强行上升成备忘。
  • 不得把少量样本写成普遍裁判规则,不得无依据推断“法院倾向”。

这个 Skill 真正要完成的动作

把争议问题压缩成:

  • 检索范围
  • 核心类案样本
  • 对我方有利/不利线索
  • 样本局限
  • 可追溯链接版本

缺信息先追问

以下信息缺失时,先补充,不要急着下“裁判倾向”:

  • 争议焦点或核心法律问题
  • 想支持哪一方立场
  • 是否限定法院层级、地区、时间范围
  • 备忘用途:内部研判、客户沟通、庭前准备

如用户只给了笼统问题,先把检索目标缩成一句话,例如“确认某类解除理由在近年裁判中的支持情况”。

推荐工作流

  1. 确定检索问题:争点、法院层级、时间范围。
  2. 选择路径:无论用户给关键词还是长案情,先提炼争点和案由词走 case-keyword;两轮关键词仍缺少事实相似样本时才升级一次 case-semantic
  3. 筛样本:取最相关案例并记录命中理由,不要只堆数量。
  4. 案号核验:先保留 case-keyword 返回的案号;只有精确匹配存疑或需要从长文本提取时,才用 125 积分的 case-number 二次核查。
  5. 结构化总结:提炼有利点、不利点、适用边界、样本局限。
  6. 链接增强:只有交付物确实需要法宝超链时,才用 125 积分的 doc-link,不要默认调用。

输出纪律

  • 不把有限样本概括成“法院普遍如此”。
  • 不把“有利样本较多”写成“结果一定如此”。
  • 对样本范围、地区偏差、时间跨度要单独提示。
  • 若要支持某一方案,仍要同时列出主要不利点。

质量门槛

  • “核心类案”必须保留可追溯线索(案号、链接或来源字段)。
  • 不输出“普遍支持”“一贯观点”等绝对判断,除非样本充分且有依据。
  • 对争议较大的结论,标注“需扩大样本继续检索”。

失败与降级

  • 样本过少:明确写“仅找到有限样本,不能据此概括整体倾向”。
  • 案号不稳:标记“待复核”,不要把该案例作为核心样本。
  • 需要快速内部讨论:先给“Top 3 样本 + 有利/不利点”,再补完整备忘。

配套文件

关联 Skill

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 90 lines · 153 tokens per session scan A 3c4cf9fbf960

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pkulaw-mcp-case-memo is a skill published in the GitHub repository NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills (64 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 153 tokens to every session and 1,199 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens