Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills --skill pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-litegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neu-zha/legal-ai-skills/pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00129 | $0.01067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00064 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
北大法宝 MCP：Contract Review Lite（单份合同初筛）
这个 Skill 只处理单份合同。
如果用户要同时筛很多份同模板或同类型合同，请转到 pkulaw-mcp-batch-contract-screening，不要在这里硬做批量处理。
这个 Skill 真正要完成的动作
把单份合同压缩成：
- 风险分级
- 条款位置
- 对应依据
- 建议动作
- 待人工复核项
缺信息先追问
以下信息缺失时，先补充，不要直接打标签：
- 合同类型（采购、销售、服务、技术、数据、劳动等）
- 审查目的（签约前、模板迭代、审批前、存量排查）
- 审查重点（付款、违约、解除、保密、知识产权、争议解决等）
- 是否有明确适用地域或行业监管要求
如用户只给全文、不说明重点，可先按付款、违约、解除、争议解决、引用依据等高频模块初筛。
推荐工作流
- 条款分段：按章节或条款号拆分输入文本。
- 锁定重点：优先检查付款、违约、解除、保密、争议解决、法律依据引用。
- 法条识别：对重点条款调用
law-recognition，提取法规名与条款线索。 - 精准回源：对已识别条款用
fatiao查原文。 - 一致性核验：用
citation-validator检查合同表述与检索/回源结果是否一致。 - 形成台账：按高、中、低风险输出问题、依据、建议动作、复核要求。
风险分级规则
- 高风险：引用法条错误、关键义务条款与法条冲突。
- 中风险：引用不完整、表述歧义、缺少适用条件。
- 低风险：表达基本规范，但建议补充解释或证据链。
输出纪律
- “高风险”只用于已有明确依据支持的问题。
- “低风险”不等于“可以直接签”，仍需结合交易背景复核。
- 没命中依据或存在歧义时，标为“待人工复核”，不要硬分级。
- 输出时优先使用“问题 + 依据 + 建议动作”的台账结构。
质量门槛
- 每个高风险项必须有可追溯依据。
- 未命中或歧义项必须标注“待人工复核”。
- 禁止输出超出检索证据范围的确定性判断。
失败与降级
- 合同太长：先按重点模块拆分，不要一次给出全篇确定性结论。
fatiao命中失败：先保留法规名和条号线索，标记“待回源”。citation-validator不可用：只能写“引用待核验”，不能写“条款引用准确”。
配套文件
- 风险台账模板：template.md
- 真实业务示例：examples.md
关联 Skill
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 90 lines · 129 tokens per session scan A 1263751dc420
pkulaw-mcp-contract-review-lite is a skill published in the GitHub repository NEU-ZHA/legal-ai-skills (64 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 129 tokens to every session and 1,067 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…