Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add neurarelay/relay-action-card --skill neura-browser-action-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/neurarelay/relay-action-cardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurarelay/relay-action-card/neura-browser-action-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurarelay/relay-action-card/neura-browser-action-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neurarelay/relay-action-card/neura-browser-action-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurarelay/relay-action-card/neura-browser-action-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neurarelay/relay-action-card/neura-browser-action-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00227 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00113 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
neura-openclaw-browser-action-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Neura Browser Action Review
Use this skill before browser submits, purchases, account changes, or other state-changing web actions. Create a refs-only Action Card and get a Decision Receipt before dispatch.
This is an example skill, not an official OpenClaw or ClawHub integration, listing, approval, or partnership.
Check
- target page or form ref is present
- user intent ref is present
- field-value refs are present without raw sensitive values
- rule or policy ref covers the proposed browser action
- delegated authority covers the target site/action family
- risk category reflects money movement, account state, customer impact, or data access
Output
Return a Decision Receipt-ready Action Card draft, missing refs, and the suggested route. Do not submit the form, click the state-changing control, expose browser secrets, or include raw form values.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 24 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A dc1500523235
neura-openclaw-browser-action-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository neurarelay/relay-action-card (2 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 227 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
playwright-recording
Record browser interactions as video using Playwright. Use for capturing demo videos, app walkthroughs, and UI flows for Remotion videos. Triggers include recording a demo, capturing browser video, screen recording a website, or creating walkthrough footage.
unix_computer_use
Local and remote desktop observation/input tools with coordinate normalization (local macOS/Linux by default; optional OSWorld HTTP and SSH Mac backends).
memstack-development-webapp-testing
Use when the user says 'write browser tests', 'test this page', 'playwright test', 'e2e test', 'end to end test', 'browser test', 'test the UI', or needs Playwright-based browser testing for a web application. Do NOT use for unit tests, API tests, or non-browser testing.
browser-doctor
Read-only health check on browser-control setup. Verifies browser binary, Playwright MCP Bridge extension presence, token file mode/contents, AIWG MCP registration, provider config injection, and optional workspace allow-list. Outputs pass/fail per check with remediation commands.
e2e
Generate and run Playwright E2E tests traced to spec.md acceptance criteria, with an optional accessibility audit. Use when saying "e2e tests" or "a11y audit".
ui-verification
Runs scoped browser probes for focus, hit targets, overflow, themes, request failures, and performance attribution, with evidence linked to UI rule IDs. Use when asked to "verify this in the browser", "reproduce this finding", or "check the fix". For source audits and severity use ui-design; field metrics require RUM…