Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot --skill n8n-structured-extractiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-structured-extraction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-structured-extraction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-structured-extraction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-structured-extraction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot/n8n-structured-extraction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01029 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
n8n-structured-extraction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
n8n Structured Extraction (JSON-schema-driven)
For ANY structured output (extraction, classification) use a dedicated structured node with a real JSON schema — never an AI-Agent node with a "return JSON" prompt, never tolerant re-parsing of raw text. This is state-of-the-art LLM document extraction, proven in production (supplier-check and invoice-extraction pipelines).
Use the right node
| Task | Node | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Pull fields out of a document/text | @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.informationExtractor |
one object matching your schema |
| Route input into categories | @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.textClassifier |
one output branch per category |
Why NOT an AI-Agent + "give me JSON"
Agent (Tools Agent) + outputParserStructured + reasoning models (gpt-5.x) fail reproducibly:
- the model wraps the result in
{"output": {...}}→ top-level schema mismatch, - and violates enums (
"verlängert"instead of the schema's"verlaengert").
Prompt-only JSON is fragile. The Information-Extractor / Text-Classifier nodes use the model's native structured-output / function-calling and enforce the schema cleanly.
How to apply
Every schema field gets a type AND a description. The description is an instruction to the
model (format hints), not decoration. Types must match the downstream sink (e.g. DataTable column
types: number↔number, string↔string). Use real umlauts (ä, ö, ü, ß) in descriptions — never ASCII
transcriptions.
// Information Extractor — manual JSON schema (nested arrays OK)
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rechnungsnummer": { "type": "string", "description": "Rechnungs-/Belegnummer wie auf dem Dokument" },
"rechnungsdatum": { "type": "string", "description": "Rechnungsdatum als ISO-Datum, z.B. 2026-05-29" },
"nettobetrag": { "type": "number", "description": "Nettobetrag in EUR, nur Zahl ohne Währungssymbol" },
"steuersatz": { "type": "number", "description": "Umsatzsteuersatz in Prozent, z.B. 19" },
"ev_typ": { "type": "string", "enum": ["einfach", "erweitert", "verlaengert"],
"description": "Art des Eigentumsvorbehalts. ASCII-Enum-Werte exakt verwenden." },
"positionen": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Einzelpositionen der Rechnung",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"bezeichnung": { "type": "string", "description": "Artikel-/Leistungsbezeichnung" },
"betrag": { "type": "number", "description": "Positionsbetrag netto in EUR" }
}
}
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 77 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A d73e2db3e7e6
n8n-structured-extraction is a skill published in the GitHub repository neurawork-git/n8n-autopilot (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,029 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
n8n-agents
Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain. AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain, Text Classifier, or Information Extractor — and whenever the user mentions AI agents, LLM with tools, tool calling, $fromAI, system prompts, agent memory, sessionId, structured/JSON output…
n8n-agents
Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain. AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain, Text Classifier, or Information Extractor — and whenever the user mentions AI agents, LLM with tools, tool calling, $fromAI, system prompts, agent memory, sessionId, structured/JSON output…
add-ai-webapi
Integrates Power Pages generative-AI summarization APIs (PREVIEW) into a Single Page Application (SPA) site — the Search Summary API and the Data Summarization API — on any record-detail or list page. Generates per-target service code (CSRF-handled) and AI site settings; delegates Web API settings, table permissions…
ai-ml-governance
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory…
nano-banana
This skill should be used for Python scripting and Gemini image generation. Use when users ask to generate images, create AI art, edit images with AI, or run Python scripts with uv. Trigger phrases include "generate an image", "create a picture", "draw", "make an image of", "nano banana", or any image generation…
meta-prompting
Enhanced reasoning patterns via slash commands (/think, /verify, /adversarial, /edge, /compare, /confidence, /budget, /constrain, /json, /flip, /assumptions, /tensions, /analyze, /trade) or natural language ("argue against", "what could break", "show reasoning", "deep review", "meta-prompts", "thinking modes"…