Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/neurofoo/agent-skills/socraticnpx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills --skill socraticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/neurofoo/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurofoo/agent-skills/socratic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neurofoo/agent-skills/socratic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neurofoo/agent-skills/socratic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
socratic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Socratic Questioning
Guide discovery through systematic questioning, helping examine a belief, decision, or idea more deeply.
Instructions
Work through multiple levels of questioning to explore the topic. The goal isn't to prove the person wrong—it's to help them (or yourself) think more clearly and deeply.
Output Format
Topic/Belief: [What we're examining]
Starting Point
The Claim/Position [Restate the belief or idea being examined]
Layer 1: Clarifying the Claim
Questions
- What exactly do you mean by [key term]?
- Can you give a specific example of this?
- What would this look like in practice?
Reflections [What these questions reveal about the claim]
Layer 2: Probing Assumptions
Hidden Assumptions
| Assumption | Question to Test It |
|---|---|
| [assumption 1] | "Is it always true that...?" |
| [assumption 2] | "What would need to be true for...?" |
Questions
- What are you taking for granted here?
- Why do you think [X] leads to [Y]?
- What if [assumption] weren't true?
Layer 3: Examining Evidence
Questions
- What evidence supports this view?
- How do you know that [claim]?
- What would change your mind?
- Is there any evidence against this?
Layer 4: Exploring Implications
Questions
- If this is true, what else follows?
- What are the consequences of believing this?
- How does this apply to [edge case]?
- If we're wrong about this, what's the cost?
Layer 5: Alternative Perspectives
Questions
- What would someone who disagrees say?
- How would [specific person/role] view this?
- What's the strongest argument against?
Steel Man The best argument against this position:
[Strongest counterargument]
Synthesis
Refined Position After questioning, a more nuanced view might be:
[Refined statement]
Remaining Questions
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
Key Insight The most valuable thing this questioning revealed:
[Insight]
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 111 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5c2e6af397da
socratic is a skill published in the GitHub repository neurofoo/agent-skills (111 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
暖纸背景 + Playfair, 左侧学习目标常驻, 含 MCQ 自测页.
best-practices
Searchable knowledge base of 152+ programming best practices across 30+ languages and frameworks. BM25-powered search over curated resources from industry leaders (Google, Airbnb, Uber, Mozilla, Shopify, OWASP).
ark-documentation
Guidance for structuring Ark documentation using the Diataxis framework. Use this skill when creating new docs, deciding where content belongs, reviewing documentation PRs, or restructuring existing documentation.