Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-cognitive-runtimenpx skills add NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcp --skill booster-cognitive-runtimegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-cognitive-runtime)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-cognitive-runtime"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-cognitive-runtime.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
booster-cognitive-runtime scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Booster Cognitive Runtime
Цель
Дать агенту восприятие уровня IDE + Git + архитектурной памяти перед тем, как он меняет код, и после изменения прогнать инженерную петлю проверки.
Preflight перед изменением
project_memory_recall(query="<task>", repo="<repo>")
preflight_analysis(task="<task>", target="<symbol>", paths=["<file>"], repo="<repo>")
impact_analysis(target="<symbol>", repo="<repo>", max_depth=3)
git_intelligence(path="<file>", symbol="<symbol>", repo="<repo>", limit=8)
collect_diagnostics(paths=["<file>"], repo="<repo>", include_security=true)
Diagnostics включает внутреннюю Python syntax-проверку без subprocess, Ruff, Pyright, TypeScript, Rust и security scanners, если соответствующие инструменты доступны. Любой timeout или crash анализатора считается ошибкой проверки.
Validation Loop после patch
validation_loop_plan(task="<task>", changed_paths=["<file>"], repo="<repo>")
run_validation_checks(commands=["<focused test>"], paths=["<file>"], repo="<repo>")
Что возвращать пользователю
- область влияния и риск
- существующие diagnostics до изменения
- git-причину исторического кода, если она есть
- какие проверки запущены
- что осталось непроверенным
Правила
- Не полагайся только на embeddings, если есть символ и граф.
- Не игнорируй красные diagnostics в затронутых файлах.
- Не считай validation успешной, если diagnostic tool упал, завис или вернул непарсимый вывод.
- Не исправляй чужие старые ошибки вне задачи без явной необходимости.
- Сохраняй устойчивые выводы через
remember_project_fact.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 52 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 9eae40862b11
booster-cognitive-runtime is a skill published in the GitHub repository NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
acontext-installer
Install Acontext, Login & Init Acontext Project, Add Skill Memory to Agent.
maintain-context
当 scripts/audit-context.mjs 报 error/warning、学习收件箱有积压待合并，或用户说"文档该更新了"、"上下文体检"、"agent 好像不懂这个项目了"、要整理规则、一个里程碑结束需要收尾时使用：体检并更新本仓库的 agent 上下文文件（AGENTS.md、.agents/skills、docs/）。.
context-efficient-coding
Use ContextFlux to minimize coding-agent context and tool calls when exploring, planning, debugging, reviewing, or modifying an unfamiliar or multi-file repository. Trigger for codebase discovery, symbol search, architecture questions, cross-file changes, error tracing, review feedback, test discovery, or any request…
contorium-workspace-memory
Use Contorium workspace memory layers (focus, session events, Git, export) when resuming AI work or avoiding repeated project explanation.
cloudmind-memory
Use CloudMind MCP as selective long-term memory. Use when a task may benefit from the user's preferences or history, prior project decisions or progress, the user asks to remember, correct, forget, restore, or archive something, or durable agent work should be preserved for a later session. Apply its safety rules when…
comet-memory
使用于 Comet 需要根据有界语义评审包判断是否值得保存个人记忆、候选、更新、遗忘或跳过时。.