Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NeverSight/learn-skills.dev --skill ley-argit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NeverSight/learn-skills.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neversight/learn-skills.dev/ley-ar)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neversight/learn-skills.dev/ley-ar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neversight/learn-skills.dev/ley-ar/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neversight/learn-skills.dev/ley-ar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neversight/learn-skills.dev/ley-ar.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.00680 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
ley-ar scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A ae9dbcfa7210
ley-ar is a skill published in the GitHub repository NeverSight/learn-skills.dev (218 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 680 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
play-policy-insights
Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and…
crisis-holding
Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…
planning-application-statement
Write the design and access statement that supports a planning application — the site analysis, the design rationale, the policy compliance, and the answers to the objections the case officer will receive. Use when asked to write a design and access statement, planning statement, or supporting statement for a planning…
ai-usage-policy
Write an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy…
functional-assessment-prep
Prepare for a disability or illness benefit assessment (a functional or work capability assessment, a medical review, a disability evaluation interview): describe how the condition affects daily life on a bad day, gather evidence, and know what to bring and say. Use when someone says 'I have a benefit assessment next…