Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add New1Direction/korgex --skill benchmark-optimization-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/New1Direction/korgexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/benchmark-optimization-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/benchmark-optimization-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/benchmark-optimization-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/benchmark-optimization-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/benchmark-optimization-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00540 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
benchmark-optimization-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to benchmark-optimization-loop — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Benchmark Optimization Loop
Use this skill to convert "make it 20x faster" or "try 50 recursive optimizations" into a bounded measured loop that can actually improve a system.
Required Baseline
Do not optimize until these exist:
- the operation being optimized;
- the correctness gate that must stay green;
- the metric: wall time, p95 latency, rows/sec, cost/run, memory, error rate;
- the current baseline;
- the search budget: max variants, max time, max spend, max data impact.
If the user asks for an unrealistic target, keep the ambition but make the loop bounded and measurable.
Loop
- Measure the baseline.
- Identify bottlenecks from evidence.
- Generate variants that test one hypothesis each.
- Run variants with the same input shape.
- Reject variants that fail correctness, safety, or reproducibility.
- Promote the fastest safe variant.
- Codify the winning path in a script, command, test, config, or doc.
- Rerun the baseline and winner to confirm the delta.
Variant Table
Track variants like this:
Variant | Hypothesis | Command | Time | Correct? | Notes
baseline | current path | npm run job | 120s | yes | stable
batch-500 | fewer round trips | npm run job -- --batch 500 | 42s | yes | winner
parallel-8 | more workers | npm run job -- --workers 8 | 31s | no | rate limited
Recursive Search
For recursive or hyperparameter work:
- persist every run to a ledger;
- compare against the prior accepted winner, not only the previous run;
- keep a holdout or replay check;
- stop when improvement is within noise, correctness fails, cost exceeds the budget, or the search starts changing more variables than it can explain.
Use phrases like "best measured safe variant" instead of "global optimum" unless the search space was actually exhaustive.
Promotion Gate
A variant cannot become the new default until:
- correctness tests pass;
- the performance delta is repeated or explained;
- rollback is obvious;
- the change is encoded in source control or a durable runbook;
- the final summary includes exact commands and measurements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 32ad49eec763
benchmark-optimization-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository New1Direction/korgex (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 540 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to benchmark-optimization-loop, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autofix
Review and repair current local changes until they converge, or run Qwen Code Autofix issue and review workflows from GitHub Actions.
smell
Detect software architecture bad smells, algorithmic complexity hotspots, and anti-patterns in a codebase. Produces a detailed markdown report identifying violations of architectural principles, design patterns, code quality, and performance complexity. Triggers on: smell, code smell, architecture smell, find…
correctness-reviewer
Always-on code-review persona. Reviews code for logic errors, edge cases, state management bugs, error propagation failures, and intent-vs-implementation mismatches. Spawned by the ce:review-beta skill as part of a reviewer ensemble.
performance-reviewer
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches database queries, loop-heavy data transforms, caching layers, or I/O-intensive paths. Reviews code for runtime performance and scalability issues. Spawned by the ce:review-beta skill as part of a reviewer ensemble.
reliability-reviewer
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches error handling, retries, circuit breakers, timeouts, health checks, background jobs, or async handlers. Reviews code for production reliability and failure modes. Spawned by the ce:review-beta skill as part of a reviewer ensemble.
flutter-svg-engineering
Design, implement, review, debug, test, migrate, secure, and optimize SVG rendering in production Flutter applications using fluttersvg and vectorgraphics. Use whenever a Flutter task involves SvgPicture, SVG assets, remote/dynamic SVG, SVG theming or ColorMapper, BoxFit/layout/clipping, semantics or RTL, SVG caching…