Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add New1Direction/korgex --skill concurrency-correctnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/New1Direction/korgexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/concurrency-correctness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/concurrency-correctness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/concurrency-correctness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/concurrency-correctness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/concurrency-correctness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00344 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
concurrency-correctness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Concurrency bugs are nondeterministic and brutal to debug — get the design right up front rather than patching symptoms.
- Find the shared mutable state. Races happen only where two flows touch the same mutable data. Enumerate it. The safest design shares nothing — pass messages / immutable data instead.
- Protect every access, consistently. If state is shared, guard ALL reads and writes with the same lock (or use an atomic/concurrent structure). A single unguarded access defeats the lock.
- Avoid deadlock. Acquire multiple locks in a consistent global order; hold them as briefly as possible; don't call out to unknown code while holding one.
- Don't assume ordering or atomicity. "It worked when I ran it" proves nothing
— interleavings you didn't see still happen.
check-then-actis a race unless atomic. - Wait on conditions, not sleeps (see condition-based-waiting). For tests of
concurrent code, synchronize on events/barriers — never
sleepto dodge a race. - Bound and clean up. Cap parallelism; ensure every spawned task is awaited or cancelled; propagate errors from workers instead of losing them.
Red flags: a sleep "fixing" flakiness, a lock around some-but-not-all accesses,
shared mutable state with no guard, swallowed worker exceptions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A bc69f55af13f
concurrency-correctness is a skill published in the GitHub repository New1Direction/korgex (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 344 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
concurrency-correctness compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concurrency-correctnessNew1Direction/korgex | Skill | 5 | 24d ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code, Codex |
| api-contract-reviewergvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi | Skill | 52 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |
| dhh-rails-reviewergvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi | Skill | 52 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| P12-modulargitRasheed/metis-skill | Skill | 2 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| api-reviewerlfyxhappy/lfcode | Skill | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| vibe-securityxushuodasd/VIBE-Claude-Plugin | Skill | 4 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| api-designsubhansh-dev/agent-maxxing | Skill | 3 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |