Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nexiouscaliver/OmniForge --skill omnicheck-githubgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nexiouscaliver/OmniForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-github)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-github/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-github.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02373 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00949 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00475 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
omnicheck-github scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OmniCheck
Verify whether requested PR changes have been applied — diff analysis + targeted nudge comments.
Check all review comment threads on a GitHub PR against the current diff. Resolved threads are marked APPLIED. Unresolved threads are analyzed by a subagent to determine if the fix was applied silently or not at all. Unaddressed threads receive nudge replies and a summary comment.
Core principle: Thread status check + diff analysis + user approval gate = accurate, non-spammy follow-up.
Announce at start: "I'm using OmniCheck to verify findings on PR #{id}."
Prerequisites
ghCLI authenticated (gh auth statusto verify)- Git repository with remote pointing to GitHub
- Current working directory is in the git repo
- PR must have review comment threads
Input Parsing
Accept any of: PR number (136), prefixed (#136), or full GitHub URL.
Extract PR ID. If URL provided, extract owner/repo and PR number.
The Process
Phase 1: GATHER — fetch all threads + PR diff/data
Phase 2: ANALYZE — single subagent checks each open thread against the diff
Phase 3: REPORT — present status table, user approves nudge list
Phase 4: NUDGE — reply on each NOT_APPLIED thread + post summary PR comment
Phase 5: DONE — no cleanup needed (no worktrees)
Thread Verdicts
| Verdict | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
APPLIED |
Thread is resolved/dismissed — trusted as-is | None |
SILENTLY_APPLIED |
Thread open, but diff shows the concern was addressed | Note in summary only |
NOT_APPLIED |
Thread open, diff shows no relevant change | Nudge: thread reply + summary row |
NEEDS_HUMAN |
Ambiguous — cannot determine from diff alone | Flag in report; no automatic nudge |
Phase 1: Gather
Step 1: Fetch all review comment threads.
mcp__omniforge__fetch_pr_discussions(pr_id="{id}", repo_root="{cwd}")
Returns structured threads with: comment_id, type, file_path, line_number, body, author, replies. The tool already excludes discussions whose notes are all system-generated — every thread returned contains at least one human note.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A e1bb5fd6b6b6
omnicheck-github is a skill published in the GitHub repository nexiouscaliver/OmniForge (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,373 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
deploy-landed
A deployment verification procedure that checks whether the intended code revision is actually running, its environment settings are present, and the product works. A deployment is the process of putting new software on a server or hosting platform.
signing-preflight
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front, instead of discovering it after a hundred unsigned commits. Never disables signing silently, never re-signs history without asking. Use at the start of…
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
pr-sweep
Use when you want to sweep all open pull requests across all repos, triage their status, run code reviews on unreviewed PRs, merge what's ready, fix quick blockers, and produce a full status report. Trigger when the user says "check my PRs", "close out open PRs", "what's the status of my PRs", "sweep my PRs", "PR…