Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nexiouscaliver/OmniForge --skill omnicheck-gitlabgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nexiouscaliver/OmniForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-gitlab)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-gitlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-gitlab/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-gitlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexiouscaliver/omniforge/omnicheck-gitlab.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03071 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01536 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
omnicheck-gitlab scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 318 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OmniCheck
Verify whether requested MR changes have been applied — diff analysis + targeted nudge comments.
Check all discussion threads on a GitLab MR against the current diff. Resolved threads are marked APPLIED. Unresolved threads are analyzed by a subagent to determine if the fix was applied silently or not at all. Unaddressed threads receive nudge replies and a summary comment. When every finding is verified applied, offer to approve the MR (as the OmniCheck bot when OMNICHECK_BOT_TOKEN is set).
Core principle: Thread status check + diff analysis + user approval gate = accurate, non-spammy follow-up — and, when clean, a one-keystroke approval.
Announce at start: "I'm using OmniCheck to verify findings on MR !{id}."
Prerequisites
glabCLI authenticated (glab auth statusto verify)- Git repository with remote pointing to GitLab
- Current working directory is in the git repo
- MR must have discussion threads
Input Parsing
Accept any of: MR number (136), prefixed (!136), or full GitLab URL.
Extract MR ID. If URL provided, extract project path and MR IID.
The Process
Phase 1: GATHER — fetch all threads + MR diff/data
Phase 2: ANALYZE — single subagent checks each open thread against the diff
Phase 3: REPORT — present status table, then branch:
Branch A (unaddressed findings): user approves nudge list
Branch B (all verified): "Approve MR? [Y/n]"
Phase 4: ACT — Branch A: reply on each NOT_APPLIED thread + summary comment
Branch B: approve_mr() + summary comment
Phase 5: DONE — no cleanup needed (no worktrees)
Auto-approval (Branch B) is OFF by default. It only appears when
NOT_APPLIED + NEEDS_HUMAN = 0, and only fires if the user answers Y. WhenOMNICHECK_BOT_TOKENis set,approve_mrapproves as the bot so it can clear the gate even when "Prevent approval by creator/committer" blocks the human user. See the setup guide.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 318 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 82c8c2a4f701
omnicheck-gitlab is a skill published in the GitHub repository nexiouscaliver/OmniForge (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,071 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
boundaries
Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.
triage
Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /phx:review to filter findings before fixing.
techdebt
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
great_cto
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
skeptical-triage
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.
vertical-real-estate
Residential-proptech domain knowledge so architect / pm aren't naive when speccing real-estate products (listings, lead-crm, transaction-coordination, property-mgmt). Codifies MLS/IDX reality, listing status lifecycle + syndication canonical-source, long-cycle lead nurture, transaction-coordination as the high-pain…