Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ngocsangyem/meowkit/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ngocsangyem/meowkit/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ngocsangyem/meowkit/fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.04147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.02073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00829 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00415 |
Grade A, and why
mk:fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fixing
Unified skill for fixing issues of any complexity with structured diagnosis.
Common Workflow (Authoritative)
Bug → Mode Select → [Check Memory: standard/deep] → Scout (MANDATORY) → Diagnose
→ [quick: confirm the known cause directly | standard/deep: investigate → sequential-thinking]
→ root cause? → yes → Root-Cause Proof → Complexity → Fix ROOT CAUSE → Verify + Prevent (MANDATORY)
→ pass → Report + capture only when recurrence/salience warrants it
→ fail <3 → re-diagnose | fail 3+ → STOP
This flow is authoritative. If prose conflicts, follow the flow.
Profiles
- quick — known cause and one or two files: minimal scout, compact root-cause proof, edit, focused before/after check, and summary. No default plan, report, wiki, memory, commit prompt, or subagent fan-out.
- standard (default) — full evidence chain, root-cause proof, focused regression test, relevant suite, and review.
- deep — standard plus an approved plan when a contract or architecture changes.
HARD GATE
Do NOT propose or implement fixes before completing Steps 1-2 (Scout + Diagnose).
Symptom fixes are failure. Find the cause first through structured analysis, NEVER guessing.
If 3+ fix attempts fail, STOP and question the architecture — discuss with user.
--quick may use the compact proof, but it never bypasses Scout, Diagnose, root-cause evidence, Verify + Prevent, or the three-failed-attempt stop.
Arguments
--auto— Standard profile with automatic progress through diagnosis and verification. It stops at any required human gate and never self-approves.--review— Human-in-the-loop. Pause at each step.--quick— Quick profile for a known cause and ≤2 files.--parallel— Paralleldeveloperagents per independent issue.--tdd— Force regression test BEFORE the fix (writes the.claude/session-state/tdd-modesentinel). Without--tdd, regression tests are recommended but not gated. Useful for security-sensitive fixes where you want to prove the bug first.--advice— Opt-in strategic supervision for one run. At named checkpoints (GUIDE → RESCUE* → REVIEW → RECHECK*, hard cap 5) the workflow asks theathenaagent to assess the situation, recommend an operational path inside the locked scope, and — after the work — review it against the evidence, with the power to return it for correction. Standard and deep profiles only. Supervision is evidence, never approval: it clears no gate, counts as no verification, and the three-failed-attempt human STOP below still fires on its own schedule. Without the flag, zero calls happen and no state is written. Contract:.claude/rules-conditional/advice-supervision-rules.md(load it only when the flag is present).
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/complexity-assessment.md 1.3 KB
- references/diagnosis-protocol.md 3.2 KB
- references/gotchas.md 2.3 KB
- references/mode-selection.md 1.2 KB
- references/parallel-exploration.md 1.4 KB
- references/prevention-gate.md 2.2 KB
- references/review-cycle.md 2.0 KB
- references/skill-activation-matrix.md 1.4 KB
- references/task-orchestration.md 2.0 KB
- references/workflow-ci.md 1.2 KB
- references/workflow-deep.md 7.0 KB
- references/workflow-logs.md 1.0 KB
- references/workflow-quick.md 1.2 KB
- references/workflow-standard.md 6.3 KB
- references/workflow-test.md 1.5 KB
- references/workflow-types.md 1.2 KB
- references/workflow-ui.md 1.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 266 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 8b6d2ace0c6a
mk:fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository ngocsangyem/MeowKit (14 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 4,147 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
investigate-ci
Investigates GitHub Actions workflow failures for any repo. Fetches recent runs, identifies failures, extracts error logs, diagnoses root causes, and suggests fixes. Use when a deploy or CI workflow fails and you need to understand why.
ci-triage-demo-ci-triage
Use when running ci triage workflows for ci-triage-demo.
atmos-lint
Atmos Terraform linting with TFLint: standalone atmos terraform lint, component-aware config discovery and toolchain versions, TFLint rule configuration, and lifecycle hooks/CI findings. Use when configuring, running, debugging, or documenting Terraform/OpenTofu linting in an Atmos project.
audit
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
deploy
Elixir/Phoenix deployment patterns — Dockerfile, fly.toml, runtime.exs, mix release, rel/ overlays. Use when configuring Fly.io, Docker, CI/CD, health checks, or production migrations.
investigate
Investigate bugs and errors in Elixir/Phoenix — root-cause analysis for crashes, exceptions, stack traces, test failures. Use --parallel for deep 4-track investigation.