Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nicepkg/ai-workflow/customer-feedback-analyzernpx skills add nicepkg/ai-workflow --skill customer-feedback-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicepkg/ai-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nicepkg/ai-workflow/customer-feedback-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nicepkg/ai-workflow/customer-feedback-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nicepkg/ai-workflow/customer-feedback-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.02518 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01259 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00504 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
customer-feedback-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- customer-feedback-analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Customer Feedback Analyzer
Collect, analyze, and prioritize user feedback to inform product decisions.
Core Principle
Never collect feedback you won't act on. Collecting feedback creates expectation of action. If you can't commit to reviewing and acting on it, don't ask for it. Destroys trust.
Feedback Channels
1. In-App Feedback Widget
Best for: Contextual feedback, low friction
// Contextual feedback
<FeedbackWidget
context={{
page: 'dashboard',
feature: 'export',
user_action: 'clicked_export'
}}
placeholder="How can we improve exports?"
/>
Pros: High quality (contextual), immediate Cons: Can interrupt user flow
2. NPS Surveys
Best for: Measuring overall satisfaction and loyalty
Question: "How likely are you to recommend [Product] to a friend or colleague?"
Scale: 0-10
Scoring:
Promoters (9-10): Love your product, will advocate
Passives (7-8): Satisfied but not enthusiastic
Detractors (0-6): Unhappy, will churn
NPS = % Promoters - % Detractors
Benchmarks:
Excellent: ≥50
Good: 30-49
Needs Work: <30
Follow-up question: "What's the main reason for your score?"
3. Support Tickets
Best for: Identifying recurring issues
Pattern Recognition:
- Same issue reported 5+ times → UX problem, not edge case
- Support time > 10 min per ticket → Needs better docs
- Ticket volume spike → Recent deploy likely caused issue
4. User Interviews
Best for: Deep qualitative insights
Interview Structure:
1. Background (5 min): Their role, use case
2. Problem Discovery (10 min): Challenges they face
3. Solution Validation (10 min): Show prototype, get reaction
4. Wrap-up (5 min): Any other feedback?
Sample Size: 5-10 users per persona
5. Feature Request Voting
Best for: Prioritizing roadmap
Tools: Canny, ProductBoard, Upvoty
Benefits:
- See most requested features
- Reduce duplicate requests
- Public roadmap transparency
- Close the loop automatically
Avoid:
- Building everything requested
- Letting voters drive strategy
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 470 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 9dd454c3b8dc
customer-feedback-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository nicepkg/ai-workflow (283 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,518 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
aatmf-t10-confidentiality-breach
AATMF T10 — Integrity & Confidentiality Breach. System prompt extraction, training-data extraction, model-weight leakage, private-key recovery.
mochi-remind
Handle due reminders — notify the user with natural language and mark them done.
memory
Use when the user asks to remember, recall, forget, update, search, or inspect durable OpenSquilla memory, including profile facts in USER.md and long-term notes in MEMORY.md or memory//.md.
lazarus-group
Adversary-emulation profile for Lazarus Group (G0032, aka Hidden Cobra / Diamond Sleet / Labyrinth Chollima), a North Korean RGB-linked actor conducting espionage, destructive, and financially motivated operations.
sidewinder-rattlesnake
Adversary-emulation profile for SideWinder (G0121 / Rattlesnake / T-APT-04 / Razor Tiger), India's suspected state-sponsored cyber-espionage actor.
ha-data-stores
Map of Hope Agent's local data stores and safe read-only query workflow. Use when the user asks where Hope Agent stores data, wants to inspect sessions/messages/memory/logs/background jobs/knowledge indexes/settings, asks the model to query local app data, or debugging requires checking persisted state. Trigger…