defense-in-depth

defense-in-depth is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NickCrew/Claude-Cortex. It costs 35 tokens per session (911 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of Defense-in-Depth Validation, MIT.

A validation approach that checks data at every layer it passes through, from the entry point to business logic and environment-specific code. The goal is to prevent invalid input from causing failures deeper in the system.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when fixing bugs caused by invalid data, especially around APIs, business rules, environment guards, and diagnostic logging.
Why use it?
A single check can be bypassed by another code path, a refactor, or a test mock. Repeated checks catch different failure cases and make the original bug harder to recreate.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when fixing bugs caused by invalid data, especially around APIs, business rules, environment guards, and diagnostic logging.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NickCrew/Claude-Cortex --skill defense-in-depth
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NickCrew/Claude-Cortex

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for defense-in-depth

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for defense-in-depth

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickcrew/claude-cortex/defense-in-depth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 911 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00911
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00364
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00182
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00091

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4d109d69f2c4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

defense-in-depth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/defense-in-depth/SKILL.md · 137 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Entry Point Validation

Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary

function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
  if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
    throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
  }
  if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 2: Business Logic Validation

Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation

function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
  if (!projectDir) {
    throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 3: Environment Guards

Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts

async function gitInit(directory: string) {
  // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
    const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
    const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));

    if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
      throw new Error(
        `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
      );
    }
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 137 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 4d109d69f2c4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

defense-in-depth is a skill published in the GitHub repository NickCrew/Claude-Cortex (62 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 911 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ci-debug

Diagnose a failing CI run against an 11-pattern playbook. Classifies the failure, cites the relevant memory entry, proposes the exact fix command — but NEVER applies without explicit user approval. Use when a specific PR check or GitHub Actions run failed and you want a diagnosis instead of speculation. Don't use for…

yonatangross/orchestkit · 92 tokens

debug

Systematically diagnose and resolve bugs through conversational investigation and root cause analysis.

rsmdt/the-startup · 15 tokens

improve

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase — refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones for better testability and AI-navigability. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, surface architectural friction, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, find shallow abstractions or leaky seams, or make code more…

rsmdt/the-startup · 99 tokens

analyze

Deep-research analysis of a codebase, a topic, or both. Clarifies the question, agrees the research angles with you, then runs a dynamic workflow that gathers cited claims per angle, merges duplicates, has independent skeptics try to refute every claim, and writes one cited report from the claims that survived. Use…

rsmdt/the-startup · 96 tokens

performance-analysis

Measurement approaches, profiling patterns, bottleneck identification, and optimization guidance. Use when diagnosing performance issues, establishing baselines, identifying bottlenecks, or planning for scale. Always measure before optimizing.

rsmdt/the-startup · 42 tokens

performance-smell-detection

Detect potential code-level performance smells in Java - streams, collections, boxing, regex, object creation. Provides awareness, not absolutes - always measure before optimizing. For JPA/database performance, use jpa-patterns instead.

decebals/claude-code-java · 51 tokens