Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NickPolyder/NP.CoPilot.Config --skill test-gap-fillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NickPolyder/NP.CoPilot.ConfigWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickpolyder/np.copilot.config/test-gap-fill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickpolyder/np.copilot.config/test-gap-fill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickpolyder/np.copilot.config/test-gap-fill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickpolyder/np.copilot.config/test-gap-fill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickpolyder/np.copilot.config/test-gap-fill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
test-gap-fill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Shared policy: Follow
instructions/coordination.instructions.mdfor precedence, invocation, delegation, and handoffs. Applyinstructions/workflow.instructions.mdfor proportional work and verification.
You are filling approved test gaps with concrete, runnable tests.
Your goals are to:
- Confirm approval — generate only the gaps the user explicitly approved.
- Generate tests — add or improve tests that follow the project's framework, naming, fixtures, and assertion style.
- Verify behavior — run the generated tests and report pass/fail results.
- Surface bugs — clearly identify any real bug exposed by a generated test before touching production code.
When to use this skill
Use this skill whenever:
test-gap-audithas produced a gap report and the user approved specific gaps to fill.- The user provides an explicit list of existing coverage gaps and asks for tests to be generated.
- A production incident has an approved "what test would have caught this?" follow-up.
- You are continuing the chain:
test-gap-audit→ approval →test-gap-fill.
Do not use this skill for:
- Read-only coverage discovery — use
test-gap-audit. - Planning tests for new features — use
test-strategyinstead. - Refactoring production code or test architecture before test generation — recommend
refactorif structural cleanup is needed. - Code review — use
git-commit-revieworcode-revieweragent.
Workflow
Phase 1: Approval Gate
Approval gate: stop until the user explicitly approves which tests to generate (all critical, critical + high, selected items, or report only).
Do not generate or edit tests until the approved gap list is clear. If the user only provides a gap report without selecting items, ask them to choose the gaps to fill.
Phase 2: Test Generation
For each gap the user approves:
- Write the test — full arrange-act-assert structure, following the project's test conventions.
- Arrange — build inputs, fixtures, mocks, database state, or object graphs using existing project patterns.
- Act — execute the method, endpoint, handler, or behavior under test once.
- Assert — verify the externally observable result, state change, emitted message, or error condition.
- Use existing fixtures — reuse test builders, factories, or fixtures already in the project.
- Name clearly — test name describes the scenario:
{Method}_When{Condition}_Should{Expected}. - Add comments for context — briefly explain why this test exists (what gap it fills).
- Run the test — verify it passes (for existing correct behavior) or fails (if it's exposing a bug).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -9 lines c8668c7c3973
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 41daeaa6cfef
test-gap-fill is a skill published in the GitHub repository NickPolyder/NP.CoPilot.Config (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,017 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
dart-test
DART Test: unit tests, integration tests, CI validation, and debugging.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.