Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder --skill interview-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder/interview-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder/interview-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder/interview-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder/interview-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder/interview-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01931 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00966 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00386 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
interview-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interview Builder
Creates a customized, ready-to-use interview guide for stakeholder interviews. Based on the 4-phase interview methodology used by professional AI consultants — designed so anyone can run an effective discovery interview, even without consulting experience.
Why This Matters
Most people don't know how to interview for AI opportunities. They ask vague questions ("Do you use AI?") and get vague answers. This skill creates targeted, role-specific interview scripts that uncover the real pain points — the ones people don't mention unless you ask the right way.
What I Need From You
- Interviewee's role/title (e.g., "VP of Operations", "Sales Manager", "Accounts Payable Clerk")
- Department (e.g., "Finance", "Sales", "Operations")
- Hypotheses to test (optional — from
/opportunity-scanneroutput, or your own theories about where AI could help) - Specific areas to probe (optional — "we think reporting takes too long" or "scheduling seems manual")
- Interview duration (default: 45-60 minutes)
What You'll Get
A complete Interview Guide with:
# Interview Guide: [Role] - [Department]
**Prepared for:** [Company Name]
**Interview Duration:** [45-60 minutes]
**Date:** [Date]
---
## Pre-Interview Checklist
- [ ] Review this person's role and responsibilities
- [ ] Review hypotheses being tested (listed below)
- [ ] Prepare recording device (with permission)
- [ ] Set up note-taking (or plan to use /insight-analyzer after)
---
## Hypotheses Being Tested
| # | Hypothesis | Key Question | Signal to Watch For |
|---|-----------|--------------|---------------------|
| 1 | [Hypothesis from scanner] | [Question] | [What would confirm/deny] |
| 2 | [Hypothesis] | [Question] | [Signal] |
---
## Phase 1: Rapport & Scene Setting (5 minutes)
**Goal:** Make them comfortable. Disarm suspicion. Build trust.
**Opening script:**
> "Thanks for making time for this. We're trying to understand how work really
> gets done here — not the org chart version, but the actual day-to-day. We're
> looking for the stuff that's frustrating or time-consuming, so we can figure
> out where AI and automation might actually help. Nothing you say here gets
> attributed to you by name."
**Calibration questions:**
- "How long have you been in this role?"
- "Can you give me the 2-minute version of what your team does?"
**Watch for:** Shoulders dropping, posture relaxing. If they're still tense,
spend more time here. Rushed rapport = guarded answers.
---
## Phase 2: Qualitative Discovery (25-30 minutes)
**Goal:** Understand how they actually work. Follow emotion. Find the real pain.
### Opener
- "Walk me through a typical day or week in your role."
### Pain Point Exploration
[Customized based on role and department]
- "[Role-specific question about their biggest time sink]"
- "[Role-specific question about repetitive tasks]"
- "What task do you dread most?"
- "Where do you spend time that doesn't feel valuable?"
- "What would you do with an extra 5 hours per week?"
### Process Deep-Dives
[Customized based on hypotheses]
- "[Question targeting Hypothesis 1]"
- "[Question targeting Hypothesis 2]"
- "How does [specific process] actually work? Walk me through it step by step."
- "What happens when something goes wrong in that process?"
### Cross-Department Probes
- "Who do you depend on most to get your work done?"
- "Where do things get stuck waiting for someone else?"
- "Is there information you need that's hard to get?"
### Red Flags to Watch For
**You've found something when:**
- Their voice changes (frustration, resignation, excitement)
- They give specific examples ("Like last Tuesday when...")
- They physically show you screens or documents
- They use candid language ("honestly this is garbage")
- They say "I know it's not the right way but..."
- They describe workarounds or unofficial processes
**Follow the emotion.** When they get animated about something, don't move on — dig deeper:
- "Tell me more about that."
- "How often does that happen?"
- "What do you do when that happens?"
---
## Phase 3: Quantitative Validation (10-15 minutes)
**Goal:** Pin down the numbers. These build your business case.
For each pain point identified in Phase 2:
- "How many hours per week does that take?"
- "How many times per [week/month] does this happen?"
- "How many people are involved in this process?"
- "What's the error rate? How often does it need to be redone?"
- "What happens when it goes wrong — what's the cost?"
### Quantification Quick Reference
| Question Pattern | Why It Matters |
|-----------------|----------------|
| "Hours per week on X?" | Direct time burden |
| "How many times per month?" | Frequency × time = annual burden |
| "How many people do this?" | Multiply impact across team |
| "What's the error/rework rate?" | Quality cost, not just time |
| "What happens when it fails?" | Downstream impact, risk |
**Pro tip:** People tend to underestimate routine tasks and overestimate one-time efforts. If someone says "about an hour," gently probe: "Walk me through what that hour looks like — start to finish." Often it's actually 90 minutes to 2 hours.
---
## Phase 4: Wrap & Closure (5 minutes)
**Goal:** Clean exit. Leave the door open.
**Summary check:**
> "Let me make sure I heard you right. The biggest things you mentioned were
> [summary of top 2-3 pain points]. Does that sound right? Anything I missed?"
**Forward-looking:**
- "If you could wave a magic wand and fix one thing about your workflow, what would it be?"
- "Is there anyone else I should talk to about [specific topic they raised]?"
**Close:**
> "This was really helpful. We may follow up with a few clarifying questions —
> is that OK? Thanks for your time."
---
## Post-Interview Actions
1. **Process immediately** — Run `/insight-analyzer` with the transcript or your notes within 24 hours (details fade fast)
2. **Note your gut feelings** — What surprised you? What seemed like a bigger deal than they let on?
3. **Update hypotheses** — Did this confirm, deny, or modify your working theories?
4. **Identify follow-ups** — Who else did they mention? What needs a deeper look?
---
Built with the AI Opportunity Finder by Morningside AI
Want expert help? → https://morningside.ai
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 215 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A e8854885fd67
interview-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository nickstellarstreamai/ai-opportunity-finder (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,931 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…