Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nicodiansk/turbocharge --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicodiansk/turbochargeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nicodiansk/turbocharge/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nicodiansk/turbocharge/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nicodiansk/turbocharge/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nicodiansk/turbocharge/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nicodiansk/turbocharge/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00574 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Implementation Plan
Read the requirements at $ARGUMENTS and create a detailed implementation plan.
Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
**Goal:** [One sentence]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies]
Context Gathering
Before planning, preload domain context. When dispatching the planner agent, prefix its prompt with:
@ATLAS.md (navigation index — use its Where to Look and Module Map tables before any codebase search)
@CLAUDE.md (conventions, rules, domain vocabulary)
If either file does not exist, omit the corresponding @ reference. @ references auto-read on dispatch so the subagent receives them in context; subagents do NOT inherit parent conversation history.
Token discipline: Do NOT paste file contents or summaries into the dispatch prompt — send task description, file paths, and line ranges only. The planner reads actual files in its own context. Duplicating content in the dispatch wastes tokens (same pattern as build skill).
Task Structure
Each task MUST follow this exact format:
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
[complete test code]
**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
Run: `[exact command]`
Expected: FAIL with "[reason]"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
[complete implementation code]
**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
Run: `[exact command]`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
`git commit -m "feat: [description]"`
Rules
- Each task: 2-5 minutes of work. If longer, split it.
- Exact file paths — not "somewhere in src/"
- Complete code — not "add validation" or pseudocode
- Exact commands with expected output
- TDD always — every task starts with a failing test
- DRY, YAGNI — don't plan features that aren't needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 82 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A f2399a6b814b
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository nicodiansk/turbocharge (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 574 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-is
Audit a design against Dieter Rams' ten "Good design is..." principles, then hand off a /make-plan prompt for one of three outcomes — new design, refine design, or redesign. Use when the user says "audit this design", "design review", "check this UI against Rams", "is this UI good", "critique this design", "design…
weekly-digests
Generate a serial week-by-week narrative digest of a project's full claude-mem timeline. Splits the timeline into per-ISO-week files, then runs one consecutive subagent per week — each receiving the prior week's carry-forward block — to produce one chapter per ISO week of data. Use when asked for "weekly digests"…
smart-explore
Token-optimized structural code search using tree-sitter AST parsing. Use instead of reading full files when you need to understand code structure, find functions, or explore a codebase efficiently.
wowerpoint
Turn one document into a kawaii NotebookLM slide-deck PDF. Use for "wowerpoint this", "make a deck about ", "turn this report into slides", or any request to render a single document as shareable narrative slides.
standup
Facilitate a read-only standup across git worktrees, branches, or PRs to compare changes and produce one consolidation plan.
version-bump
Automated semantic versioning and release workflow for Claude Code plugins. Handles version increments across package.json, marketplace.json, plugin.json manifests, build verification, git tagging, GitHub releases, and changelog generation. NPM publishing is the final human-required handoff because the maintainer…