Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nikuscs/codex-cc-pluginnpx agentmods add skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin/claude-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00118 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00047 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
claude-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Claude Review
Run a read-only repository review using Claude.
Allowed review scopes:
autoworking-treebranch--base <ref>
Do not pass extra freeform focus text to this flow. Use adversarial review for that.
node plugins/claude/scripts/claude-companion.mjs review --scope auto
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b04894df74c2
claude-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nikuscs/codex-cc-plugin (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 118 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
improve
Autonomous quality improvement loop. Scores a target against a rubric, selects the highest-leverage axis, attacks it, verifies, documents, and loops. No pre-planning between iterations — each loop re-scores from scratch.
triage
GitHub issue and PR investigator. Pulls open issues/PRs, classifies them, searches the codebase for root cause or reviews contributed code, proposes fixes with file:line references, and optionally implements fixes. Use for investigating GitHub issues and reviewing PRs; do NOT use for general code review unrelated to…
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.
writing-extensions
Guide for authoring a new in-process MCP tool extension for gerrit-mcp-server. Use when a user wants to add new Gerrit tools, port a standalone plugin MCP server into the extension framework, or needs a worked example of the ExtensionContext API.
gerrit-task-query
Use when asked to check, list, or act on tasks for a Gerrit change. Triggers on phrases like "what tasks are blocking", "which tasks are actionable", "check task status", "what do I need to do for this change", "what is blocking this change".
gerrit-workflow
This skill should be used when the user asks to "submit a change to Gerrit", "push for review", "upload a patch", "update a change in Gerrit", "add a patch set", "work with Gerrit", "push to refs/for", "fix a missing Change-Id", "amend a Gerrit change", or any task involving git operations in a repository hosted on…