Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill data-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/data-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/data-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/data-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/data-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/data-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01332 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00666 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
data-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Quality
Purpose
Catch bad data before it reaches a dashboard, a model, or a customer. A pipeline that silently propagates corrupt data is worse than one that fails, because the failure is discovered downstream, later, by someone who trusts the number.
When to Use
- Ingesting data from a source you do not control.
- Building quality gates into a pipeline.
- Investigating a metric that looks wrong.
- Auditing a dataset before it is used for analysis or training.
Capabilities
- Profiling: distributions, cardinality, null rates, outliers.
- Schema validation and type enforcement.
- Constraint checks: uniqueness, referential integrity, ranges, formats.
- Freshness, completeness, and volume anomaly detection.
- Quarantine and alerting patterns.
Inputs
- The dataset and its expected schema.
- The business rules the data must satisfy.
- Historical volume and distribution, for anomaly baselines.
Outputs
- A profile of the data as it actually is, not as documented.
- Validation checks that run on every load.
- A quarantine path for rows that fail, and an alert when they do.
Workflow
- Profile before you trust — Row count, null rate, cardinality, min/max, and the distribution of every column. The documented schema and the actual data disagree more often than not.
- Validate the schema at the boundary — Column presence, types, and nullability, checked on ingest. A silently added column or a type change upstream is the most common pipeline break.
- Assert the business rules — Uniqueness on keys, referential integrity, valid ranges, and formats.
total_cents >= 0is a rule; assert it. - Check freshness and volume — Is the data recent, and is there roughly as much of it as usual? A pipeline that runs successfully on an empty file is the failure that is hardest to notice.
- Quarantine, do not drop — Failing rows go to a quarantine table with the reason. Dropping them silently destroys the evidence needed to fix the source.
- Fail loudly and stop — A pipeline that continues past a failed quality gate has published bad data. Stop, alert, and keep the previous good version live.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 117 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f454f954371e
data-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection (26 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,332 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".