Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill incident-responsegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/incident-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/incident-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/incident-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/incident-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/incident-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
incident-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Response
Purpose
Restore service quickly, then learn from what happened. The two mistakes that define bad incident response are debugging before mitigating, and a postmortem whose action items are never done.
When to Use
- An active production incident.
- Writing a postmortem.
- Building runbooks and an on-call practice.
- Reviewing a pattern of repeated incidents.
Capabilities
- Triage: severity assessment and impact scoping.
- Mitigation: rollback, feature flag, traffic shift, scaling.
- Incident command: roles, communication, and timeline keeping.
- Blameless postmortems and contributing-factor analysis.
- Runbook authoring.
Inputs
- The alert, the symptom, and the user impact.
- Recent changes: deploys, config changes, flag flips, dependency incidents.
- The system's rollback and degradation options.
Outputs
- Service restored, with the mitigation recorded.
- A timeline of what happened and what was done.
- A postmortem with owned, dated action items.
Workflow
- Establish impact — Who is affected, how badly, and is it growing? This determines severity and whether to wake more people.
- Mitigate before diagnosing — If a deploy went out in the last hour, roll it back. Understanding why it broke can wait; users cannot. This is the single most important rule and the one most often violated by engineers who want to know the answer.
- Assign roles — For anything beyond a small incident: an incident commander (decides), a communications lead (updates stakeholders), and operators (execute). The commander does not type.
- Communicate on a cadence — Status updates at fixed intervals, even when the update is "still investigating". Silence is interpreted as chaos.
- Record the timeline as you go — Timestamped actions and observations, in the incident channel. Reconstructing it afterwards produces a fiction.
- Postmortem within a week — Blameless, focused on contributing factors, with action items that have an owner and a date.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 94 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 3d8abf3f53d8
incident-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection (26 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,116 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".